These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33995554)

  • 1. Peer review of third trimester abdominal circumference measurements.
    Dyer E; Chudleigh T
    Ultrasound; 2021 May; 29(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 33995554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Caradeux J; Martinez-Portilla RJ; Peguero A; Sotiriadis A; Figueras F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):449-459.e19. PubMed ID: 30633918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality-improvement program for ultrasound-based fetal anatomy screening using large-scale clinical audit.
    Yaqub M; Kelly B; Stobart H; Napolitano R; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 30302849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving precision of second-trimester biometry.
    Loiacono C; Bethune M; Schneider M; Lombardo P
    Australas J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 21(3):156-160. PubMed ID: 34760516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organ-specific learning curves of sonographers performing first-trimester anatomical screening and impact of score-based evaluation on ultrasound image quality.
    Bardi F; Bakker M; Elvan-Taşpınar A; Kenkhuis MJA; Fridrichs J; Bakker MK; Birnie E; Bilardo CM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279770. PubMed ID: 36730474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine third-trimester ultrasound for the detection of small-for-gestational age in low-risk pregnancies (ROTTUS study): randomized controlled trial.
    Wanyonyi SZ; Orwa J; Ozelle H; Martinez J; Atsali E; Vinayak S; Temmerman M; Figueras F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 57(6):910-916. PubMed ID: 33619823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Audit of Second-Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scans Based on a Novel Image-Scoring Method in the Southwest Region of the Netherlands.
    Ursem NTC; Peters IA; Kraan-van der Est MN; Reijerink-Verheij JCIY; Knapen MFCM; Cohen-Overbeek TE
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 28299806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal circumference: a single measurement versus growth rate in the prediction of intrapartum Cesarean section for fetal distress.
    Williams KP; Nwebube N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 17(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 11422969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Could masking gestational age estimation during scanning improve detection of small-for-gestational-age fetuses? A controlled pre-post evaluation.
    Rowley A; Dyer E; Scott JG; Aiken CE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 Aug; 1(3):100035. PubMed ID: 33345799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21
    Cavallaro A; Ash ST; Napolitano R; Wanyonyi S; Ohuma EO; Molloholli M; Sande J; Sarris I; Ioannou C; Norris T; Donadono V; Carvalho M; Purwar M; Barros FC; Jaffer YA; Bertino E; Pang R; Gravett MG; Salomon LJ; Noble JA; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 28718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Dighe M; Mitidieri A; Oberto M; Qingqing W; Shah J; Sohoni S; Al Zidjali W; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 22411446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting feasibility and quality of second-trimester ultrasound scans in obese pregnant women.
    Fuchs F; Houllier M; Voulgaropoulos A; Levaillant JM; Colmant C; Bouyer J; Senat MV
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 23023941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulating realistic fetal neurosonography images with appearance and growth change using cycle-consistent adversarial networks and an evaluation.
    Xu Y; Lee LH; Drukker L; Yaqub M; Papageorghiou AT; Noble AJ
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Sep; 7(5):057001. PubMed ID: 32968691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does early second-trimester sonography predict adverse perinatal outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies?
    Allaf MB; Campbell WA; Vintzileos AM; Haeri S; Javadian P; Shamshirsaz AA; Ogburn P; Figueroa R; Wax J; Markenson G; Chavez MR; Ravangard SF; Ruano R; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Salmanian B; Meyer M; Johnson J; Ozhand A; Davis S; Borgida A; Belfort MA; Shamshirsaz AA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 25154937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction.
    Caradeux J; Eixarch E; Mazarico E; Basuki TR; Gratacós E; Figueras F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 28332335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonically measured biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference: intra- and interobserver variation in the third trimester.
    Vine DG; Cooperberg PL; Dansereau J
    Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):385-7. PubMed ID: 1418140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
    Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of intrauterine growth restriction with customised estimated fetal weight centiles.
    Owen P; Ogah J; Bachmann LM; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 12699804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.