These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33995917)

  • 1. Identifying the minimum amplicon sequence depth to adequately predict classes in eDNA-based marine biomonitoring using supervised machine learning.
    Dully V; Wilding TA; Mühlhaus T; Stoeck T
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():2256-2268. PubMed ID: 33995917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing quantile regression spline analyses and supervised machine learning for environmental quality assessment at coastal marine aquaculture installations.
    Leontidou K; Rubel V; Stoeck T
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15425. PubMed ID: 37334127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supervised machine learning is superior to indicator value inference in monitoring the environmental impacts of salmon aquaculture using eDNA metabarcodes.
    Frühe L; Cordier T; Dully V; Breiner HW; Lentendu G; Pawlowski J; Martins C; Wilding TA; Stoeck T
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):2988-3006. PubMed ID: 32285497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supervised machine learning improves general applicability of eDNA metabarcoding for reservoir health monitoring.
    Hu H; Wei XY; Liu L; Wang YB; Jia HJ; Bu LK; Pei DS
    Water Res; 2023 Nov; 246():120686. PubMed ID: 37812979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring.
    Cordier T; Forster D; Dufresne Y; Martins CIM; Stoeck T; Pawlowski J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 30014577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the Ecological Quality Status of Marine Environments from eDNA Metabarcoding Data Using Supervised Machine Learning.
    Cordier T; Esling P; Lejzerowicz F; Visco J; Ouadahi A; Martins C; Cedhagen T; Pawlowski J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(16):9118-9126. PubMed ID: 28665601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting environmental stressor levels with machine learning: a comparison between amplicon sequencing, metagenomics, and total RNA sequencing based on taxonomically assigned data.
    Hempel CA; Buchner D; Mack L; Brasseur MV; Tulpan D; Leese F; Steinke D
    Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1217750. PubMed ID: 38075934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture.
    Pearman JK; Keeley NB; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Thomson-Laing G; Biessy L; Atalah J; Pochon X
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10231. PubMed ID: 33194417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiome-based classification models for fresh produce safety and quality evaluation.
    Liao C; Wang L; Quon G
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Apr; 12(4):e0344823. PubMed ID: 38445872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy).
    Cordier T; Frontalini F; Cermakova K; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Treglia M; Scantamburlo E; Bonamin V; Pawlowski J
    Mar Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 146():24-34. PubMed ID: 30890270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
    Chen JC; Tyler AD
    Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities.
    Laroche O; Wood SA; Tremblay LA; Lear G; Ellis JI; Pochon X
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3347. PubMed ID: 28533985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IPED: a highly efficient denoising tool for Illumina MiSeq Paired-end 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data.
    Mysara M; Leys N; Raes J; Monsieurs P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17(1):192. PubMed ID: 27130479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LANDMark: an ensemble approach to the supervised selection of biomarkers in high-throughput sequencing data.
    Rudar J; Porter TM; Wright M; Golding GB; Hajibabaei M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):110. PubMed ID: 35361114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A streamlined pipeline based on HmmUFOtu for microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
    Kim H; Kim J; Choi JW; Ahn KS; Park DI; Kim S
    Genomics Inform; 2023 Sep; 21(3):e40. PubMed ID: 37813636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
    Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment.
    Stat M; Huggett MJ; Bernasconi R; DiBattista JD; Berry TE; Newman SJ; Harvey ES; Bunce M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12240. PubMed ID: 28947818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Persistence of marine fish environmental DNA and the influence of sunlight.
    Andruszkiewicz EA; Sassoubre LM; Boehm AB
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185043. PubMed ID: 28915253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.