411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33999521)
1. Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial activity: A prospective study.
Raad G; Bakos HW; Bazzi M; Mourad Y; Fakih F; Shayya S; Mchantaf L; Fakih C
Andrology; 2021 Sep; 9(5):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 33999521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sperm-preparation techniques for men with normal and abnormal semen analysis. A comparison.
Erel CT; Senturk LM; Irez T; Ercan L; Elter K; Colgar U; Ertungealp E
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 11127104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The pellet swim-up is the best technique for sperm preparation during in vitro fertilization procedures.
Volpes A; Sammartano F; Rizzari S; Gullo S; Marino A; Allegra A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 26984108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.
Oguz Y; Guler I; Erdem A; Mutlu MF; Gumuslu S; Oktem M; Bozkurt N; Erdem M
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jun; 35(6):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 29572695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.
Le MT; Dang HNT; Nguyen TV; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen QHV; Cao NT
J Int Med Res; 2022 May; 50(5):3000605221097492. PubMed ID: 35545843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure.
Zhao F; Yang Q; Shi S; Luo X; Sun Y
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39051. PubMed ID: 27958357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Iatrogenic DNA damage induced in human spermatozoa during sperm preparation: protective significance of seminal plasma.
Twigg J; Irvine DS; Houston P; Fulton N; Michael L; Aitken RJ
Mol Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 4(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 9665630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What are the effects of vitamin C on sperm functional properties during direct swim-up procedure?
Raad G; Mansour J; Ibrahim R; Azoury J; Azoury J; Mourad Y; Fakih C; Azoury J
Zygote; 2019 Apr; 27(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 30834849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Simple, Centrifugation-Free, Sperm-Sorting Device Eliminates the Risks of Centrifugation in the Swim-Up Method While Maintaining Functional Competence and DNA Integrity of Selected Spermatozoa.
Meitei HY; Uppangala S; Sharan K; Chandraguthi SG; Radhakrishnan A; Kalthur G; Schlatt S; Adiga SK
Reprod Sci; 2021 Jan; 28(1):134-143. PubMed ID: 32734563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting, Density Gradient and Swim-up Methods on Semen Oxidation Reduction Potential.
Gode F; Gürbüz AS; Tamer B; Pala I; Isik AZ
Urol J; 2020 May; 17(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 32478404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human sperm Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) mediates acrosome reaction, oxidative stress markers, and sperm parameters in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in infertile men.
Sahnoun S; Sellami A; Chakroun N; Mseddi M; Attia H; Rebai T; Lassoued S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1067-1077. PubMed ID: 28550386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity.
Zini A; Finelli A; Phang D; Jarvi K
Urology; 2000 Dec; 56(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 11113773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of leukocytospermia and processing by discontinuous density gradient on sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial activity.
Fariello RM; Del Giudice PT; Spaine DM; Fraietta R; Bertolla RP; Cedenho AP
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2009 Mar; 26(2-3):151-7. PubMed ID: 19184399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphometrical comparison of human spermatozoa obtained from semen and swim-up methodology.
Domínguez LA; Burgos MH; Fornés MW
Andrologia; 1999 Jan; 31(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9949885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples.
Brandeis VT; Manuel MT
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Aug; 10(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 8019090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
Butt F; Chohan MA
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sperm selection by rheotaxis improves sperm quality and early embryo development.
Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J; Laguna-Barraza R; Fernández-González R; Štiavnická M; Ward F; Cloherty J; McAuliffe D; Larsen PB; Grabrucker AM; Gutiérrez-Adán A; Newport D; Fair S
Reproduction; 2021 Mar; 161(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 33600356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement in motion characteristics and acrosome status in cryopreserved human spermatozoa by swim-up processing before freezing.
Esteves SC; Sharma RK; Thomas AJ; Agarwal A
Hum Reprod; 2000 Oct; 15(10):2173-9. PubMed ID: 11006194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
