291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34001121)
1. Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.
Hegselmann S; Storck M; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Varghese J; Bruland P; Meidt A; Mertens C; Riepenhausen S; Baier S; Stöcker B; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 34001121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Common Data Elements for Meaningful Stroke Documentation in Routine Care and Clinical Research: Retrospective Data Analysis.
Berenspöhler S; Minnerup J; Dugas M; Varghese J
JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 9(10):e27396. PubMed ID: 34636733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repository.
Dugas M; Meidt A; Neuhaus P; Storck M; Varghese J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():65. PubMed ID: 27245222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QL
Ulrich H; Kern J; Tas D; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Ückert F; Ingenerf J; Lablans M
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Mar; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 30885183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System-Based Semantic Analysis and Experts' Review.
Holz C; Kessler T; Dugas M; Varghese J
JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Aug; 7(3):e13554. PubMed ID: 31407666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The need for harmonized structured documentation and chances of secondary use - results of a systematic analysis with automated form comparison for prostate and breast cancer.
Krumm R; Semjonow A; Tio J; Duhme H; Bürkle T; Haier J; Dugas M; Breil B
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Oct; 51():86-99. PubMed ID: 24747879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ISO/IEC 11179 norm for metadata registries: does it cover healthcare standards in empirical research?
Ngouongo SM; Löbe M; Stausberg J
J Biomed Inform; 2013 Apr; 46(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 23246614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical MetaData ontology: a simple classification scheme for data elements of clinical data based on semantics.
Kim HH; Park YR; Lee KH; Song YS; Kim JH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31429750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TermiCron - Bridging the Gap Between FHIR Terminology Servers and Metadata Repositories.
Wiedekopf J; Ulrich H; Drenkhahn C; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Ingenerf J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():71-75. PubMed ID: 35672973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bridging Documentation and Metadata Standards: Experiences from a Funding Initiative for Registries.
Stausberg J; Harkener S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1046-1050. PubMed ID: 31438084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design of case report forms based on a public metadata registry: re-use of data elements to improve compatibility of data.
Dugas M
Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):566. PubMed ID: 27899162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of ISO/TS 21526 Towards the Extension of a Standardized Query API.
Ulrich H; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Drenkhahn C; Löbe M; Ingenerf J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Nov; 275():202-206. PubMed ID: 33227769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining health data elements under the HL7 development framework for metadata management.
Yang Z; Jiang K; Lou M; Gong Y; Zhang L; Liu J; Bao X; Liu D; Yang P
J Biomed Semantics; 2022 Mar; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 35303946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. User Expectations of Metadata Repositories for Clinical Research.
Löbe M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 253():60-64. PubMed ID: 30147041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Ontology-Based Approach for Consolidating Patient Data Standardized With European Norm/International Organization for Standardization 13606 (EN/ISO 13606) Into Joint Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Repositories: Description of a Methodology.
Frid S; Pastor Duran X; Bracons Cucó G; Pedrera-Jiménez M; Serrano-Balazote P; Muñoz Carrero A; Lozano-Rubí R
JMIR Med Inform; 2023 Mar; 11():e44547. PubMed ID: 36884279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.
Kim HH; Park YR; Lee S; Kim JH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32620117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harvesting metadata in clinical care: a crosswalk between FHIR, OMOP, CDISC and openEHR metadata.
Bönisch C; Kesztyüs D; Kesztyüs T
Sci Data; 2022 Oct; 9(1):659. PubMed ID: 36307424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic Conversion of Metadata from the Study of Health in Pomerania to ODM.
Hegselmann S; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 236():88-96. PubMed ID: 28508783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metadata Repository for Improved Data Sharing and Reuse Based on HL7 FHIR.
Ulrich H; Kock AK; Duhm-Harbeck P; Habermann JK; Ingenerf J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():162-6. PubMed ID: 27577363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Building a semantic web-based metadata repository for facilitating detailed clinical modeling in cancer genome studies.
Sharma DK; Solbrig HR; Tao C; Weng C; Chute CG; Jiang G
J Biomed Semantics; 2017 Jun; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 28583204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]