BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34001121)

  • 1. Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.
    Hegselmann S; Storck M; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Varghese J; Bruland P; Meidt A; Mertens C; Riepenhausen S; Baier S; Stöcker B; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 34001121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Common Data Elements for Meaningful Stroke Documentation in Routine Care and Clinical Research: Retrospective Data Analysis.
    Berenspöhler S; Minnerup J; Dugas M; Varghese J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 9(10):e27396. PubMed ID: 34636733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repository.
    Dugas M; Meidt A; Neuhaus P; Storck M; Varghese J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():65. PubMed ID: 27245222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QL
    Ulrich H; Kern J; Tas D; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Ückert F; Ingenerf J; Lablans M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Mar; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 30885183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System-Based Semantic Analysis and Experts' Review.
    Holz C; Kessler T; Dugas M; Varghese J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Aug; 7(3):e13554. PubMed ID: 31407666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The need for harmonized structured documentation and chances of secondary use - results of a systematic analysis with automated form comparison for prostate and breast cancer.
    Krumm R; Semjonow A; Tio J; Duhme H; Bürkle T; Haier J; Dugas M; Breil B
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Oct; 51():86-99. PubMed ID: 24747879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ISO/IEC 11179 norm for metadata registries: does it cover healthcare standards in empirical research?
    Ngouongo SM; Löbe M; Stausberg J
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Apr; 46(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 23246614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical MetaData ontology: a simple classification scheme for data elements of clinical data based on semantics.
    Kim HH; Park YR; Lee KH; Song YS; Kim JH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31429750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TermiCron - Bridging the Gap Between FHIR Terminology Servers and Metadata Repositories.
    Wiedekopf J; Ulrich H; Drenkhahn C; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Ingenerf J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():71-75. PubMed ID: 35672973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bridging Documentation and Metadata Standards: Experiences from a Funding Initiative for Registries.
    Stausberg J; Harkener S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1046-1050. PubMed ID: 31438084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of case report forms based on a public metadata registry: re-use of data elements to improve compatibility of data.
    Dugas M
    Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):566. PubMed ID: 27899162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of ISO/TS 21526 Towards the Extension of a Standardized Query API.
    Ulrich H; Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Drenkhahn C; Löbe M; Ingenerf J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Nov; 275():202-206. PubMed ID: 33227769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining health data elements under the HL7 development framework for metadata management.
    Yang Z; Jiang K; Lou M; Gong Y; Zhang L; Liu J; Bao X; Liu D; Yang P
    J Biomed Semantics; 2022 Mar; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 35303946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User Expectations of Metadata Repositories for Clinical Research.
    Löbe M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 253():60-64. PubMed ID: 30147041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Ontology-Based Approach for Consolidating Patient Data Standardized With European Norm/International Organization for Standardization 13606 (EN/ISO 13606) Into Joint Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Repositories: Description of a Methodology.
    Frid S; Pastor Duran X; Bracons Cucó G; Pedrera-Jiménez M; Serrano-Balazote P; Muñoz Carrero A; Lozano-Rubí R
    JMIR Med Inform; 2023 Mar; 11():e44547. PubMed ID: 36884279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.
    Kim HH; Park YR; Lee S; Kim JH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32620117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harvesting metadata in clinical care: a crosswalk between FHIR, OMOP, CDISC and openEHR metadata.
    Bönisch C; Kesztyüs D; Kesztyüs T
    Sci Data; 2022 Oct; 9(1):659. PubMed ID: 36307424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic Conversion of Metadata from the Study of Health in Pomerania to ODM.
    Hegselmann S; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 236():88-96. PubMed ID: 28508783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metadata Repository for Improved Data Sharing and Reuse Based on HL7 FHIR.
    Ulrich H; Kock AK; Duhm-Harbeck P; Habermann JK; Ingenerf J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():162-6. PubMed ID: 27577363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building a semantic web-based metadata repository for facilitating detailed clinical modeling in cancer genome studies.
    Sharma DK; Solbrig HR; Tao C; Weng C; Chute CG; Jiang G
    J Biomed Semantics; 2017 Jun; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 28583204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.