These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3400318)

  • 1. [The psychoacoustic phenomenon of masking level differences in the human subject studied by auditory evoked potentials].
    Kevanishvili ZSh; Lagidze ZP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1988; 38(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 3400318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masking level difference: an electrophysiological approach.
    Kevanishvili Z; Lagidze Z
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 3589477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reflection of the effect of binaural release from masking in human long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Vaĭtulevich SF; Mal'tseva NF
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 3582841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of binaural interaction by the characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials in guinea pigs].
    Chudnovskiĭ SI; Moroz BS; Poliakov AN
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 3447058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The manifestation in human long-latency auditory evoked potentials of the phenomenon of successive backward masking].
    Al'tman IaA; Vaĭtulevich SF
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10204292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural masking and sensitivity to interaural delay in the inferior colliculus.
    Palmer AR; Rees A; Caird D
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun; 336(1278):415-22. PubMed ID: 1354383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural unmasking of frequency-following responses in rat amygdala.
    Du Y; Huang Q; Wu X; Galbraith GC; Li L
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1647-59. PubMed ID: 19036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of masking on interhemispheric and bilateral asymmetry of long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Koroleva IV; Adikashvili DN; Shurgaia GG; Kevanishvili ZSh
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1985 Jun; 99(6):643-5. PubMed ID: 4016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equivalent dipoles of the binaural interaction components and their comparison with binaurally evoked human auditory 40 Hz steady-state evoked potentials.
    Zaaroor M; Bleich N; Mittelman N; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2003 Jun; 24(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 12799547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.
    Strelcyk O; Christoforidis D; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1878-88. PubMed ID: 19813802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masking level differences: auditory evoked responses with homophasic and antiphasic signal and noise.
    Yonovitz A; Thompson CL; Lozar J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 491565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reverse adaptation studied by recording short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Petrov SM; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1998; 24(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 9778900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of signals in modulated and unmodulated noise observed using auditory evoked potentials.
    Androulidakis AG; Jones SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1783-93. PubMed ID: 16793334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N; von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reflection of the effect of release from masking in the activity of neurons of the inferior colliculus in the cat].
    Nikitin NI; Popelarzh I
    Neirofiziologiia; 1985; 17(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 4047243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.