BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34003219)

  • 1. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Peterse EFP; Lietz AP; Seguin CL; Meester RGS; Perdue LA; Lin JS; Siegel RL; Doria-Rose VP; Feuer EJ; Zauber AG; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1998-2011. PubMed ID: 34003219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
    D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.
    Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.
    Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; Siegel RL; Chen JC; Dwyer A; Ahnen DJ; Smith RA; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(14):2964-2973. PubMed ID: 29846933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    ; Davidson KW; Barry MJ; Mangione CM; Cabana M; Caughey AB; Davis EM; Donahue KE; Doubeni CA; Krist AH; Kubik M; Li L; Ogedegbe G; Owens DK; Pbert L; Silverstein M; Stevermer J; Tseng CW; Wong JB
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1965-1977. PubMed ID: 34003218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Perdue LA; Henrikson NB; Bean SI; Blasi PR
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1978-1998. PubMed ID: 34003220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.
    Berger BM; Parton MA; Levin B
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e77-81. PubMed ID: 26881323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Buskermolen M; Cenin DR; Helsingen LM; Guyatt G; Vandvik PO; Haug U; Bretthauer M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5383. PubMed ID: 31578177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    ; Bibbins-Domingo K; Grossman DC; Curry SJ; Davidson KW; Epling JW; García FAR; Gillman MW; Harper DM; Kemper AR; Krist AH; Kurth AE; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Owens DK; Phillips WR; Phipps MG; Pignone MP; Siu AL
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 27304597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Knudsen AB; Wilschut J; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 149(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 18838717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Meza R; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Ten Haaf K; Cao P; Bastani M; Han SS; Blom EF; Jonas DE; Feuer EJ; Plevritis SK; de Koning HJ; Kong CY
    JAMA; 2021 Mar; 325(10):988-997. PubMed ID: 33687469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient organized colorectal cancer screening in Shenzhen: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Zhu M; Zhong X; Liao T; Peng X; Lei L; Peng J; Cao Y
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):655. PubMed ID: 38429684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.
    Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.
    Helsingen LM; Vandvik PO; Jodal HC; Agoritsas T; Lytvyn L; Anderson JC; Auer R; Murphy SB; Almadi MA; Corley DA; Quinlan C; Fuchs JM; McKinnon A; Qaseem A; Heen AF; Siemieniuk RAC; Kalager M; Usher-Smith JA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bretthauer M; Guyatt G
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5515. PubMed ID: 31578196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.