These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34003917)

  • 1. The Effect of Test Distance on Visual Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using the Pelli-Robson Chart.
    Njeru SM; Osman M; Brown AM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 10(2):32. PubMed ID: 34003917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
    Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Ohio Contrast Cards: Visual Performance in a Pediatric Low-vision Site.
    Hopkins GR; Dougherty BE; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):946-956. PubMed ID: 28972542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Veracity of using a visual chart with a testing distance of 2.5 meters for measurement of distance visual acuity in teenagers].
    Cui JJ; Zhang MM; Luo MY; Gan LY; Yang JY; Xie HY; Kang WJ; Zhao JL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 57(2):122-125. PubMed ID: 33541053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.
    Karampatakis V; P Papadopoulou E; Almpanidou S; Karamitopoulos L; Almaliotis D
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0288512. PubMed ID: 38330096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):822-5. PubMed ID: 2250890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with advanced glaucoma: comparison of two tests.
    Jammal AA; Ferreira BG; Zangalli CS; Vianna JR; Thompson AC; Artes PH; Costa VP; Reis ASC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1418-1422. PubMed ID: 31974085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration.
    Maynard ML; Zele AJ; Feigl B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):e772-e778. PubMed ID: 27225020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA; Weatherill J
    Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 5)():712-7. PubMed ID: 2282946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.
    Bittner AK; Jeter P; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 21747309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-dependent effects on contrast sensitivity, near and distance acuity: difference in functional parameters? (Prospective, randomized pilot trial of photodynamic therapy versus full macular translocation).
    Ziemssen F; Lüke M; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Gelisken F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 246(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 18071731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast sensitivity and binocular reading speed best correlating with near distance vision-related quality of life in bilateral nAMD.
    Rossouw P; Guichard MM; Hatz K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):760-769. PubMed ID: 32959926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and validation of a chart-based measure of the limits of spatial contrast sensitivity.
    Adhikari P; Carter DD; Feigl B; Zele AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 34755353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.