These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34004455)

  • 1. Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
    Li Y; Adur MK; Wang W; Schultz RB; Hale B; Wierson W; Charley SE; McGrail M; Essner J; Tuggle CK; Ross JW
    Theriogenology; 2021 Aug; 170():107-116. PubMed ID: 34004455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
    Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of oocyte/zygote timing for in vitro fertilization and gene editing in the dog.
    Mukai C; Nelson JL; Cheong SH; Diel de Amorim M; Travis AJ
    Theriogenology; 2020 Jul; 150():347-352. PubMed ID: 32088047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; LE QA; Hirano T; Otoi T
    J Reprod Dev; 2019 Jun; 65(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 30726783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Hirano T; Takemoto T; Nakai M; Fuchimoto DI; Otoi T
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Jan; 90(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30368976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages.
    Le QA; Tanihara F; Wittayarat M; Namula Z; Sato Y; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Hirata M; Otoi T
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Jan; 14(1):7. PubMed ID: 33407863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient edition of the bovine PRNP prion gene in somatic cells and IVF embryos using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
    Bevacqua RJ; Fernandez-Martín R; Savy V; Canel NG; Gismondi MI; Kues WA; Carlson DF; Fahrenkrug SC; Niemann H; Taboga OA; Ferraris S; Salamone DF
    Theriogenology; 2016 Nov; 86(8):1886-1896.e1. PubMed ID: 27566851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.
    Whitworth KM; Lee K; Benne JA; Beaton BP; Spate LD; Murphy SL; Samuel MS; Mao J; O'Gorman C; Walters EM; Murphy CN; Driver J; Mileham A; McLaren D; Wells KD; Prather RS
    Biol Reprod; 2014 Sep; 91(3):78. PubMed ID: 25100712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient generation of GGTA1-deficient pigs by electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into in vitro-fertilized zygotes.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Sawamoto O; Kikuchi T; Doi M; Otoi T
    BMC Biotechnol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 32811500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of voltage strength during electroporation on the development and quality of in vitro-produced porcine embryos.
    Nishio K; Tanihara F; Nguyen TV; Kunihara T; Nii M; Hirata M; Takemoto T; Otoi T
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Apr; 53(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 29135047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.
    Sato M; Kosuke M; Koriyama M; Inada E; Saitoh I; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Miyoshi K
    Theriogenology; 2018 Mar; 108():29-38. PubMed ID: 29195121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of chemically mediated CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing systems using different nonviral vectors in porcine embryos.
    Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Torigoe N; Liu B; Namula Z; Hirata M; Tanihara F; Nagahara M; Otoi T
    Anim Sci J; 2023; 94(1):e13878. PubMed ID: 37818780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ICSI, IVF, and in vivo derived embryos to produce CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation.
    Briski O; La Motta GE; Ratner LD; Allegroni FA; Pillado S; Álvarez G; Gutierrez B; Tarragona L; Zaccagnini A; Acerbo M; Ciampi C; Fernández-Martin R; Salamone DF
    Theriogenology; 2024 May; 220():43-55. PubMed ID: 38471390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing and duration of lipofection-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery into porcine zygotes affect gene-editing events.
    Lin Q; Le QA; Takebayashi K; Thongkittidilok C; Wittayarat M; Hirata M; Tanihara F; Otoi T
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Oct; 14(1):389. PubMed ID: 34627381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell Cycle Stage and DNA Repair Pathway Influence CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Efficiency in Porcine Embryos.
    Gutierrez K; Glanzner WG; de Macedo MP; Rissi VB; Dicks N; Bohrer RC; Baldassarre H; Agellon LB; Bordignon V
    Life (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35207459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome Editing in Pigs.
    Preisinger D; Winogrodzki T; Klinger B; Schnieke A; Rieblinger B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2631():393-417. PubMed ID: 36995680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs.
    Hirata M; Wittayarat M; Tanihara F; Sato Y; Namula Z; Le QA; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Otoi T
    In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim; 2020 Sep; 56(8):614-621. PubMed ID: 32978715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in
    Zhang WW; Matlashewski G
    mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suppression of mosaic mutation by co-delivery of CRISPR associated protein 9 and three-prime repair exonuclease 2 into porcine zygotes via electroporation.
    Yamashita S; Kogasaka Y; Hiradate Y; Tanemura K; Sendai Y
    J Reprod Dev; 2020 Feb; 66(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 31761839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Followed by CRIPSR/Cas9 Microinjection Results in Highly Efficient Genome Editing in Cloned Pigs.
    Sheets TP; Park CH; Park KE; Powell A; Donovan DM; Telugu BP
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 27918485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.