These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34004529)

  • 1. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
    Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent Print Proficiency Testing: An Examination of Test Respondents, Test-Taking Procedures, and Test Characteristics.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Pan KDH
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):450-457. PubMed ID: 31509243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of a Blind Quality Control Program in a Forensic Laboratory.
    Hundl C; Neuman M; Rairden A; Rearden P; Stout P
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 31873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 36870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel approach for latent print identification using accurate overlays to prioritize reference prints.
    Gantz DT; Gantz DT; Walch MA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():162-70. PubMed ID: 25447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
    Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program.
    Neuman M; Hundl C; Grimaldi A; Eudaley D; Stein D; Stout P
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):964-974. PubMed ID: 35349174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations.
    Mejia R; Cuellar M; Salyards J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():293-298. PubMed ID: 33083776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects and benefits of a latent print AFIS deferral policy.
    Hudman R; Hines D; Hilliard S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112047. PubMed ID: 38733654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
    Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Implementation of an Effective Blind Proficiency Testing Program.
    Pierce ML; Cook LJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):809-814. PubMed ID: 31922611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.