These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34006059)

  • 1. First comparison of a new dynamic navigation system and surgical guides for implantology: an in vitro study.
    Duré M; Berlinghoff F; Kollmuss M; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 34006059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.
    Stünkel R; Zeller AN; Bohne T; Böhrnsen F; Wedi E; Raschke D; Kauffmann P
    Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Oct; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 36198996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
    González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yimarj P; Subbalekha K; Dhanesuan K; Siriwatana K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):672-678. PubMed ID: 32939934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation.
    Böse MWH; Beuer F; Schwitalla A; Bruhnke M; Herklotz I
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104265. PubMed ID: 35995082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Aydemir CA; Arısan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Mar; 31(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 31829457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods.
    Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
    Wang Y; Xie C; Fang T; Chen Z; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 36525249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
    Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.
    Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
    Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
    Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.