These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34006079)

  • 41. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 25032765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience.
    Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: A systematic review.
    Bohner L; Gamba DD; Hanisch M; Marcio BS; Tortamano Neto P; Laganá DC; Sesma N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 30017156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Miyoshi K; Tanaka S; Yokoyama S; Sanda M; Baba K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31608509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark.
    Kim JE; Amelya A; Shin Y; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):755-761. PubMed ID: 27863856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of Different Factors on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions of Multiple Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    Zhang YJ; Qiao SC; Qian SJ; Zhang CN; Shi JY; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):442-449. PubMed ID: 34115056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Sallorenzo A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 33836855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e54-64. PubMed ID: 23879869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.
    Huang R; Liu Y; Huang B; Zhou F; Chen Z; Li Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):623. PubMed ID: 34876122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
    Flügge TV; Att W; Metzger MC; Nelson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 27148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence.
    Goracci C; Franchi L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 26487391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.
    Huang R; Liu Y; Huang B; Zhang C; Chen Z; Li Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):625-633. PubMed ID: 32181919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Adaskevicius R; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Nov; 28(4):173-181. PubMed ID: 32673469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.