These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34006081)

  • 1. Comparison of conventional and digital workflows for implant-supported screw-retained zirconia FPD bars: Fit and cement gap evaluation using SEM analysis.
    Rutkūnas V; Gedrimiene A; Jacobs R; Malinauskas M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 34006081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow.
    Rutkunas V; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P; Mangano F; Gedrimiene A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 22(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 32026603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conventional and Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Complete Implant-Supported Bars: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Vieira SNV; Lourenço MF; Pereira RC; França EC; Vilaça ÊL; Silveira RR; Silva GC
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jun; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 37297310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study.
    Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Rotkina L; Zbären C; Enkling N; Blatz MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23025489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study.
    Gedrimiene A; Adaskevicius R; Rutkunas V
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Oct; 11(5):271-279. PubMed ID: 31754417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different fabrication workflows on the passive fit of screw-retained bar splinting two interforaminal implants: a parallel blinded randomised clinical trial.
    Eldin BSG; Talaat IA; Nawar NHH; Mohamed AMA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 38566034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.
    Benic GI; Sailer I; Zeltner M; Gütermann JN; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 30396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps.
    Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim NY; Kim YL; Cho HW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):735-49. PubMed ID: 23927066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
    Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misfit simulation on implant-supported prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases: Part 3: A radiographic evaluation.
    Rutkunas V; Kules D; Mischitz I; Huber S; Revilla-León M; Larsson C; Janda M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38418304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Biancardino M; De Lillo A; Troiano G; Guida L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):435-440. PubMed ID: 31027957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
    Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.