These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34006493)

  • 21. Association of dentoskeletal morphology with incisor inclination in angle class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Kirschneck C; Römer P; Proff P; Lippold C
    Head Face Med; 2013 Sep; 9():24. PubMed ID: 24004488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effect of soft tissue thickness of upper lip on lip retraction in orthodontical-treated Class II, Division 1 females].
    Zou L; Chen Y; Liu H; Na B; He J; Fan X
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 41(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 27241150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes of the upper lip in orthodontic and orthopedic treatment of angle's class II malocclusion.
    Paranhos LR; Benedicto Ede N; Ramos AL
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 24025884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance.
    Lew K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Nov; 11(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 2591485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study.
    Mishra D; Natarajan M; Urala AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):684-693. PubMed ID: 33010980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction.
    Waldman BH
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Apr; 52(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 6954864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Saelens NA; De Smit AA
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 9699401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign®: A retrospective study.
    Chen J; Wen J; Huang L; Zhang L; Han L; Li H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Oct; 101(40):e30919. PubMed ID: 36221412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.
    Weyrich C; Lisson JA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 19322531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of lip thickness in upper lip response to sagittal change of incisor position.
    Alkadhi RM; Finkelman MD; Trotman CA; Kanavakis G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Feb; 22(1):53-57. PubMed ID: 30549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of apical root resorption following extraction therapy in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Taner T; Ciğer S; Sençift Y
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Oct; 21(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 10565089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Correlation analysis of the nasolabial angle of Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with vertical growth pattern after tooth extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Peng M; Kang J; Zhou J; Du B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 33(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 26552244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners.
    Hennessy J; Garvey T; Al-Awadhi EA
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):706-12. PubMed ID: 27571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.
    Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.