These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34006493)

  • 41. Unpredictability of soft tissue changes after camouflage treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with maximum anterior retraction using miniscrews.
    Kim K; Choi SH; Choi EH; Choi YJ; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 27768390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R; Jernigan C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females.
    Caplan MJ; Shivapuja PK
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9107377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. First premolar extractions and fixed appliances in the Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Carter NE
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3164207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship between Selected Cephalometric Parameters, Nasolabial Angle and Its Components in Adolescent Females.
    Gołębiowski M; Świątkowska A; Pastuszak P; Rahnama M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differential premolar extractions.
    Steyn CL; du Preez RJ; Harris AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):480-6. PubMed ID: 9387833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predictors of outcome among patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with fixed appliances in the permanent dentition.
    Burden DJ; McGuinness N; Stevenson M; McNamara T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 10511675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction.
    Oliver BM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6961784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Profile changes following orthodontic correction of bimaxillary protrusion with a preadjusted edgewise appliance.
    Tan TJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 9456627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Condylar position and maxillary first premolar extraction.
    Gianelly AA; Cozzani M; Boffa J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 May; 99(5):473-6. PubMed ID: 2028937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions.
    Miller RA; Tieu L; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 23030552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21867432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The differences of hard tissue changes and stability of Angle's Class II division 1 extraction cases treated by Begg appliance and Edgewise appliance].
    Zeng JL; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(3):275-8, 283. PubMed ID: 18705510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of lip response to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults.
    Hodges A; Rossouw PE; Campbell PM; Boley JC; Alexander RA; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 19413391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stability of the lower labial segment following orthodontic treatment--a comparison of treatment with Andresen and Begg appliances.
    Sims AP; Springate SD
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7786861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion.
    Gönner U; Ozkan V; Jahn E; Toll DE
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Sep; 68(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 17882366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Clinical effect of premolar extraction with high torque self-locking appliances].
    Chen SX; Tang GH; Jiang YN; Gu YJ; Zhang T; Gao MQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Dec; 24(6):739-42. PubMed ID: 27063130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.