151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34008191)
1. Production of complementary defense metabolites reflects a co-evolutionary arms race between a host plant and a mutualistic bark beetle-fungal complex.
Ullah A; Klutsch JG; Erbilgin N
Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Sep; 44(9):3064-3077. PubMed ID: 34008191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Host Defense Metabolites Alter the Interactions between a Bark Beetle and its Symbiotic Fungi.
Agbulu V; Zaman R; Ishangulyyeva G; Cahill JF; Erbilgin N
Microb Ecol; 2022 Oct; 84(3):834-843. PubMed ID: 34674014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle.
Erbilgin N; Cale JA; Lusebrink I; Najar A; Klutsch JG; Sherwood P; Enrico Bonello P; Evenden ML
Tree Physiol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):338-350. PubMed ID: 27881799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera.
Arango-Velez A; González LM; Meents MJ; El Kayal W; Cooke BJ; Linsky J; Lusebrink I; Cooke JE
Tree Physiol; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1220-39. PubMed ID: 24319029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatty Acid Composition of Novel Host Jack Pine Do Not Prevent Host Acceptance and Colonization by the Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle and Its Symbiotic Fungus.
Ishangulyyeva G; Najar A; Curtis JM; Erbilgin N
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162046. PubMed ID: 27583820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence that Ophiostomatoid Fungal Symbionts of Mountain Pine Beetle Do Not Play a Role in Overcoming Lodgepole Pine Defenses During Mass Attack.
Fortier CE; Musso AE; Evenden ML; Zaharia LI; Cooke JEK
Mol Plant Microbe Interact; 2024 May; 37(5):445-458. PubMed ID: 38240660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi.
Cale JA; Muskens M; Najar A; Ishangulyyeva G; Hussain A; Kanekar SS; Klutsch JG; Taft S; Erbilgin N
Tree Physiol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1597-1610. PubMed ID: 28985375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.
Klutsch JG; Najar A; Sherwood P; Bonello P; Erbilgin N
J Chem Ecol; 2017 May; 43(5):506-518. PubMed ID: 28466378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induced Defenses of a Novel Host Tree Affect the Growth and Interactions of Bark Beetle-Vectored Fungi.
Wang F; Cale JA; Erbilgin N
Microb Ecol; 2020 Jul; 80(1):181-190. PubMed ID: 32020257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel application of RNase H2-dependent quantitative PCR for detection and quantification of Grosmannia clavigera, a mountain pine beetle fungal symbiont, in environmental samples.
McAllister CH; Fortier CE; St Onge KR; Sacchi BM; Nawrot MJ; Locke T; Cooke JEK
Tree Physiol; 2018 Mar; 38(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 29329457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of phloem nutrients on overwintering mountain pine beetles and their fungal symbionts.
Goodsman DW; Erbilgin N; Lieffers VJ
Environ Entomol; 2012 Jun; 41(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 22732605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of plant ontogeny and damage type on phloem and foliage monoterpenes in jack pine (Pinus banksiana).
Erbilgin N; Colgan LJ
Tree Physiol; 2012 Aug; 32(8):946-57. PubMed ID: 22659460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses.
Zaman R; Antonioli F; Shah A; Ullah A; May C; Klutsch JG; Erbilgin N
Microb Ecol; 2023 Nov; 86(4):2666-2673. PubMed ID: 37486583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Successful Colonization of Lodgepole Pine Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle Increased Monoterpene Production and Exhausted Carbohydrate Reserves.
Roth M; Hussain A; Cale JA; Erbilgin N
J Chem Ecol; 2018 Feb; 44(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 29302834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest?
Lusebrink I; Erbilgin N; Evenden ML
J Chem Ecol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1209-20. PubMed ID: 23955061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial characteristics of volatile communication in lodgepole pine trees: Evidence of kin recognition and intra-species support.
Hussain A; Rodriguez-Ramos JC; Erbilgin N
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 692():127-135. PubMed ID: 31344566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The legacy of attack: implications of high phloem resin monoterpene levels in lodgepole pines following mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins.
Clark EL; Huber DP; Carroll AL
Environ Entomol; 2012 Apr; 41(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 22507014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle.
Lusebrink I; Evenden ML; Blanchet FG; Cooke JE; Erbilgin N
J Chem Ecol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1013-26. PubMed ID: 21874397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inducible pine rosin defense mediates interactions between an invasive insect-fungal complex and newly acquired sympatric fungal associates.
Cheng C; Zhou F; Lu M; Sun J
Integr Zool; 2015 Sep; 10(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 25939920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.
Therrien J; Mason CJ; Cale JA; Adams A; Aukema BH; Currie CR; Raffa KF; Erbilgin N
Oecologia; 2015 Oct; 179(2):467-85. PubMed ID: 26037523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
