These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34008328)

  • 1. Digital scanning under rubber dam: An innovative method for making definitive impressions in fixed prosthodontics.
    Henarejos-Domingo V; Clavijo V; Blasi Á; Madeira S; Roig M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Oct; 33(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 34008328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The digital impression under rubber dam: clinical insights for an accurate scan].
    Gerdolle D; Browett S; Gresnigt MMM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 36748679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical impressions assessment for overlay restorations with rubber dam: A clinical trial.
    Espona J; Roig E; Ali A; Vidal C; Garcia-Font M; Roig M; Figueras O
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104825. PubMed ID: 38157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral Scanning with Rubber Dam Isolation in Place for Fabrication of a Chairside Computer-assisted Design and Computer-assisted Manufacture Ceramic Restoration.
    Jurado CA; Lederman R; Cohen J; Tsujimoto A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):943-946. PubMed ID: 34753849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Digital Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
    Giachetti L; Sarti C; Cinelli F; Russo DS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 32069344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review.
    Ting-Shu S; Jian S
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jun; 24(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 25220390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protocol for Indirect Restoration Intraoral Scanning Under Dental Dam Isolation: A Dental Technique.
    Caponi LQ; Flor E; Ortega-Martínez J; Figueras-Alvarez O
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):725-728. PubMed ID: 34013629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner.
    Mennito AS; Evans ZP; Nash J; Bocklet C; Lauer Kelly A; Bacro T; Cayouette M; Ludlow M; Renne WG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 31058428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Applications of Intraoral Scanning in Removable Prosthodontics: A Literature Review.
    AlRumaih HS
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):747-762. PubMed ID: 34043266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Siqueira R; Galli M; Chen Z; Mendonça G; Meirelles L; Wang HL; Chan HL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6517-6531. PubMed ID: 34568955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital scan over dental dam: workflow for successful clinical outcome.
    Clavijo V; Duart E S
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Jul; 52(8):660-665. PubMed ID: 34076378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
    Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [
    Xu XX; Cao Y; Zhao YJ; Jia L; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 33550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses.
    Takeuchi Y; Koizumi H; Furuchi M; Sato Y; Ohkubo C; Matsumura H
    J Oral Sci; 2018; 60(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29576569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review.
    Kihara H; Hatakeyama W; Komine F; Takafuji K; Takahashi T; Yokota J; Oriso K; Kondo H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 31474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching].
    Liu J; Sun XS; Zhang RT; Wang B; Wu CL; Ye LJ; Yu DD
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Aug; 29(4):445-448. PubMed ID: 33089300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chochlidakis KM; Papaspyridakos P; Geminiani A; Chen CJ; Feng IJ; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):184-190.e12. PubMed ID: 26946916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.