139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34008509)
1. Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
Goh GS; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E143-E149. PubMed ID: 34008509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients With Poor Baseline Mental Health May Experience Significant Improvements in Pain and Disability After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.
Goh GS; Liow MHL; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):205-214. PubMed ID: 31714282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time Taken to Return to Work Does Not Influence Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.
Liow MHL; Goh GS; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):503-509. PubMed ID: 30247375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Single-level Minimally-invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Five-year Follow-up Study.
Goh GS; Liow MHL; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):809-817. PubMed ID: 30475348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?
Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; 37(5):E179-E184. PubMed ID: 38178316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Have Similar Clinical Outcomes, Perioperative Complications, and Fusion Rates As Their Younger Counterparts.
Goh GS; Tay YWA; Liow MHL; Gatot C; Ling ZM; Fong PL; Soh RCC; Guo CM; Yue WM; Tan SB; Chen JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 478(4):822-832. PubMed ID: 32197034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.
Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P
Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
