These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34008509)
1. Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? Goh GS; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E143-E149. PubMed ID: 34008509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry. Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database. Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients With Poor Baseline Mental Health May Experience Significant Improvements in Pain and Disability After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Goh GS; Liow MHL; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):205-214. PubMed ID: 31714282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time Taken to Return to Work Does Not Influence Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study. Liow MHL; Goh GS; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):503-509. PubMed ID: 30247375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes? Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Single-level Minimally-invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Five-year Follow-up Study. Goh GS; Liow MHL; Yeo W; Ling ZM; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):809-817. PubMed ID: 30475348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis? Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; 37(5):E179-E184. PubMed ID: 38178316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results. Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Have Similar Clinical Outcomes, Perioperative Complications, and Fusion Rates As Their Younger Counterparts. Goh GS; Tay YWA; Liow MHL; Gatot C; Ling ZM; Fong PL; Soh RCC; Guo CM; Yue WM; Tan SB; Chen JL Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 478(4):822-832. PubMed ID: 32197034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up. Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]