These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3400851)

  • 1. A comparison of different methods of lubrication of glass syringes used to identify the epidural space.
    Leiman BC; Katz J; Salzarulo H; Warters RD; Butler BD
    Anaesthesia; 1988 May; 43(5):397-8. PubMed ID: 3400851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loss of resistance technique for locating the epidural space: evaluation of glass and plastic syringes.
    Butler BD; Warters RD; Elk JR; Davies I; Abouleish E
    Can J Anaesth; 1990 May; 37(4 Pt 1):438-9. PubMed ID: 2340613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space.
    Lin BC; Chen KB; Chang CS; Wu KC; Liu YC; Chen CC; Wu RS
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Jun; 40(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 12194391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dual-chambered syringe that allows identification of the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique with air and with saline.
    Candido KD; Winnie AP
    Reg Anesth; 1992; 17(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 1606099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A loss-of-resistance technique using both air and saline.
    Glantz L; Gozal Y; Gertel M
    Reg Anesth; 1994; 19(4):294. PubMed ID: 7947435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Episure Autodetect syringe, a loss-of-resistance technique for locating the epidural space, used in pediatric patients.
    Tielens LK; Bruhn J; Vogt M; van Geffen GJ; Scheffer GJ
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 23(8):747-50. PubMed ID: 23763707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss-of-resistance technique using both air and saline.
    Barros S
    Reg Anesth; 1995; 20(5):462-3. PubMed ID: 8519731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The learning curve associated with the epidural technique using the Episure™ AutoDetect™ versus conventional glass syringe: an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of experienced anesthesiologists in obstetric patients.
    Carabuena JM; Mitani AM; Liu X; Kodali BS; Tsen LC
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jan; 116(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 23223103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the techniques for the identification of the epidural space using the loss-of-resistance technique or an automated syringe - results of a randomized double-blind study.
    Duniec L; Nowakowski P; Sieczko J; Chlebus M; Łazowski T
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 27797094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.
    Kartal S; Kösem B; Kılınç H; Köşker H; Karabayırlı S; Çimen NK; Demircioğlu RI
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 20(8):992-997. PubMed ID: 28891544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost-effective, non-invasive system for pressure monitoring during epidural needle insertion: Design, development and bench tests.
    Tesei M; Saccomandi P; Massaroni C; Quarta R; Carassiti M; Schena E; Setola R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():194-197. PubMed ID: 28268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards a realistic in vitro experience of epidural Tuohy needle insertion.
    Vaughan N; Dubey VN; Wee MY; Isaacs R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):767-77. PubMed ID: 23636758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks.
    Gülen G; Akkaya T; Ozkan D; Kaydul M; Gözaydin O; Gümüş H
    Agri; 2012; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22399127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of epidural space using air and normal saline.
    Goodyear P
    Anaesthesia; 2001 Apr; 56(4):397-8. PubMed ID: 11284871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of epidural space using air with normal saline.
    Kale SS; Oosthuysen SA
    Anaesthesia; 2000 Jun; 55(6):615-6. PubMed ID: 10866764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists.
    Jeong SM; Choi JM; Kim JH; Yoo H; Lee S; Seo H; Kim S; Kim SH
    J Anesth; 2016 Aug; 30(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 27193185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problem with Portex 'loss of resistance' syringes.
    Adyanthaya SS; Ochoa-Ferraro M; Corfe J; Fromings K; Al-Naimi K
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Sep; 69(9):1063-4. PubMed ID: 25117025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor epidural anesthetics comparing loss of resistance with air versus saline: does the choice matter?
    Norman D; Winkelman C; Hanrahan E; Hood R; Nance B
    AANA J; 2006 Aug; 74(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 16918122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in the gliding characteristics of 10-ml plastic syringes used to locate the extradural space by "loss of resistance" techniques.
    Bricker SR; Coleman P
    Br J Anaesth; 1988 Dec; 61(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 3207550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar epidural anaesthesia.
    Downing JW; Houlton PC; Brock-Utne JG; Mankowitz E
    S Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(21):844-7. PubMed ID: 505233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.