These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34008710)

  • 1. WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS.
    Azzam RS; Azzam GB; Nasi A
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2021; 34(1):e1566. PubMed ID: 34008710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
    Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
    Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current applications of evolving methodologies in gastroesophageal reflux disease testing.
    Weber C; Davis CS; Fisichella PM
    Dig Liver Dis; 2011 May; 43(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 21324762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
    Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
    Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
    Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system.
    Schneider JH; Kramer KM; Königsrainer A; Granderath FA
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2076-80. PubMed ID: 17484003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wireless pH monitoring: better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits.
    Grigolon A; Bravi I; Cantù P; Conte D; Penagini R
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Aug; 39(8):720-4. PubMed ID: 17602906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
    Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
    Kessels SJM; Newton SS; Morona JK; Merlin TL
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 51(9):777-788. PubMed ID: 28877081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term wireless pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: prolonging the test beyond 48 hours is unnecessary and may be misleading.
    Capovilla G; Salvador R; Spadotto L; Voltarel G; Pesenti E; Perazzolo A; Nicoletti L; Merigliano S; Costantini M
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
    Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
    Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.
    Ahlawat SK; Novak DJ; Williams DC; Maher KA; Barton F; Benjamin SB
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16340628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.
    Sweis R; Fox M; Anggiansah A; Wong T
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 May; 23(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 21235685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.