These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3401038)

  • 1. Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.
    Laatikainen TJ; Tenhunen AK; Venesmaa PK; Apter DL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1988; 243(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 3401038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].
    Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
    Winston RM; Margara RA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical treatment for distal tubal occlusion. A review of 167 cases.
    Verhoeven HC; Berry H; Frantzen C; Schlösser HW
    J Reprod Med; 1983 May; 28(5):293-304. PubMed ID: 6152981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases.
    Singhal V; Li TC; Cooke ID
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 1883785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated.
    Mossa B; Patella A; Ebano V; Pacifici E; Mossa S; Marziani R
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2005; 32(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 16433156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
    Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Microsurgical treatment of tubal infertility].
    Breznik R; Borko E; Dolenec N
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1985; 25(1-2):17-20. PubMed ID: 4087927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Correlation between endometriosis and fallopian tube patency in sterility patients especially after microsurgical sterility operations].
    Schmeisser JO; Krause T; Lober R; Köhler G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(7):397-400. PubMed ID: 8766100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy rates after operative endoscopic treatment of total (neosalpingostomy) or near total (salpingostomy) distal tubal occlusion.
    Dlugi AM; Reddy S; Saleh WA; Mersol-Barg MS; Jacobsen G
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Nov; 62(5):913-20. PubMed ID: 7926134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility].
    Fritzsche H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(21):1325-9. PubMed ID: 2278215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
    Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery.
    Marana R; Rizzi M; Muzii L; Catalano GF; Caruana P; Mancuso S
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):924-9. PubMed ID: 7589635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of microsurgical operations of tubal-induced sterility--selection for extracorporeal fertilization].
    Karbowski B; Schneider HP
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Nov; 46(11):825-8. PubMed ID: 3803879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery].
    Korell M; Strowitzki T; Hepp H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 8585362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An alternative approach to the surgical correction of tubal infertility].
    Radchenko NA; Mynbaev OA; Arslanian KN; Volodin SV; Danilov AIu
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1995; (5):18-20. PubMed ID: 8579197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive outcome after unilateral tubocornual anastomosis and contralateral salpingostomy by microsurgery.
    McComb PF; Lee NH; Stephenson MD
    Fertil Steril; 1991 May; 55(5):1011-3. PubMed ID: 2022259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No correlation between peritubal and mucosal adhesions in hydrosalpinges.
    Vasquez G; Boeckx W; Brosens I
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):1032-3. PubMed ID: 7589623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Salpingostomy and the resection of tubal adhesions by microsurgery].
    Nava Y Sánchez RM; Rosas Arceo J; Gorostieta García EA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1987 Sep; 55():239-44. PubMed ID: 3154205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of pattern of tubal disease for microsurgery or in vitro fertilization in Lagos.
    Ogedengbe BK; Giwa-Osagie OF; Emuveyan EE
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1987 May; 79(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 3586048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.