These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34011186)

  • 1. Examining Potential User Experience Trade-Offs Between Common Computer Display Configurations.
    Burruss CC; Bjornsen E; Gallagher KM
    Hum Factors; 2023 May; 65(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 34011186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User experience with ultrawide curved displays: A mixed methods analysis.
    Gallagher KM; Vasavada A; Austin G
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jul; 118():104291. PubMed ID: 38663269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Using Multiple Computer Monitors for Office Tasks Affect User Experience? : A Systematic Review.
    Gallagher KM; Cameron L; De Carvalho D; Boulé M
    Hum Factors; 2021 May; 63(3):433-449. PubMed ID: 31809202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Curved Versus Flat Monitors: Interactive Effects of Display Curvature Radius and Display Size on Visual Search Performance and Visual Fatigue.
    Kyung G; Park S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32374635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. User-preferred position of computer displays: effects of display size.
    Shin G; Hegde S
    Hum Factors; 2010 Oct; 52(5):574-85. PubMed ID: 21186737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles.
    Young JG; Trudeau M; Odell D; Marinelli K; Dennerlein JT
    Work; 2012; 41(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 22246308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task.
    Sollenberger RL; Milgram P
    Hum Factors; 1993 Sep; 35(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 8244411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the biomechanical stress in the neck and shoulders during augmented reality interactions.
    Kim JH; Ari H; Madasu C; Hwang J
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103175. PubMed ID: 32678782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of visual display distance on eye accommodation, head posture, and vision and neck symptoms.
    Rempel D; Willms K; Anshel J; Jaschinski W; Sheedy J
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):830-8. PubMed ID: 17915601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where to put the creases? Interactions between hand length, task, screen size, and folding method on the suitability of hand-held foldable display devices.
    Lee S; Kyung G; Choi D; Yi J; Kim M; Choi B; Lee S
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):723-733. PubMed ID: 30938586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring.
    Jungk A; Thull B; Hoeft A; Rau G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Dec; 15(7-8):469-79. PubMed ID: 12578045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field observations of display placement requirements and character size for presbyopic and prepresbyopic computer users.
    Bartha MC; Allie P; Kokot D; Roe CP
    Work; 2015; 52(2):329-42. PubMed ID: 26444933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.
    Bitterman N
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2006 Jun; 20(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 16699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of electronic map displays and individual differences in ability on navigation performance.
    Rodes W; Gugerty L
    Hum Factors; 2012 Aug; 54(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 22908682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating biomechanics of user-selected sitting and standing computer workstation.
    Lin MY; Barbir A; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():382-388. PubMed ID: 28499555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the Microsoft Kinect™ to assess 3-D shoulder kinematics during computer use.
    Xu X; Robertson M; Chen KB; Lin JH; McGorry RW
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():418-423. PubMed ID: 28395854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks.
    Yu D; Green C; Kasten SJ; Sackllah ME; Armstrong TJ
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A(Pt A):281-9. PubMed ID: 26585502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a single accelerometer based biofeedback system for real-time correction of neck posture in computer users.
    Breen PP; Nisar A; Olaighin G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():7269-72. PubMed ID: 19965101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of touch target location on performance and physical demands of computer touchscreen use.
    Kang H; Shin G
    Appl Ergon; 2017 May; 61():159-167. PubMed ID: 28237014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glasses-type wearable computer displays: usability considerations examined with a 3D glasses case study.
    Chang J; Moon SK; Jung K; Kim W; Parkinson M; Freivalds A; Simpson TW; Baik SP
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):670-681. PubMed ID: 29103342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.