123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34011453)
1. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
Alukic E; Mekis N
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of body mass index on patient radiation dose in general radiography.
Dolenc L; Petrinjak B; Mekiš N; Škrk D
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Nov; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 36319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY: LOWER ORGAN DOSE WITH THE USE OF PA PROJECTION.
Alukić E; Mekiš N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 31034550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.
Alukic E; Skrk D; Mekis N
Radiol Oncol; 2018 May; 52(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 30511934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. OPTIMAL COLLIMATION SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY.
Pazanin A; Skrk D; O'Driscoll JC; McEntee MF; Mekis N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 32363403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of the lateral lumbar spine projection using an air-gap technique.
Bellizzi A; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 32052755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar spine radiographs - is it time for widespread adoption of posteroanterior projection?
Green C; Karnati G; Thomson K; Subramanian A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190386. PubMed ID: 31356113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimisation of patient dose for the horizontal beam technique in lateral lumbar spine radiographic examinations.
Davis AT; Hopkins SA
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130053. PubMed ID: 23652542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The radiation exposure associated with cervical and lumbar spine radiographs.
Simpson AK; Whang PG; Jonisch A; Haims A; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):409-12. PubMed ID: 18679095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The radiation dose, clinical and anatomical implications of erect lumbar spine radiography: A single centre pre-post implementation evaluation.
Bradley C; Snaith B
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jul; 29(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 37187066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
