130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34012293)
1. Prediction of Risk Factors for Pathological Fracture After Bone Tumor Biopsy Using Finite Element Analysis.
Iwai T; Hoshi M; Oebisu N; Orita K; Shimatani A; Takada N; Nakamura H
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():3849-3856. PubMed ID: 34012293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploration of the Optimal Shape for Bone Tumour Biopsy.
Iwai T; Hoshi M; Oebisu N; Orita K; Shimatani A; Takada N; Nakamura H
Anticancer Res; 2019 Aug; 39(8):4191-4197. PubMed ID: 31366505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Assessment for Pathological Fracture After Bone Tumour Biopsy.
Iwai T; Hoshi M; Oebisu N; Orita K; Shimatani A; Takada N; Nakamura H
Anticancer Res; 2021 Feb; 41(2):679-686. PubMed ID: 33517272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.
Liebl H; Garcia EG; Holzner F; Noel PB; Burgkart R; Rummeny EJ; Baum T; Bauer JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116907. PubMed ID: 25723187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral drill holes decrease strength of the femur: an observational study using finite element and experimental analyses.
Fox MJ; Scarvell JM; Smith PN; Kalyanasundaram S; Stachurski ZH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 8():29. PubMed ID: 24004617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical study on the laminate stacking sequence in composite bone plates for vancouver femur B1 fracture fixation.
Dhason R; Roy S; Datta S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105680. PubMed ID: 32763643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New insights on the proximal femur biomechanics using Digital Image Correlation.
Katz Y; Yosibash Z
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109599. PubMed ID: 32008806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis and computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of rat tibia with simulated lytic defects.
Rennick JA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Kimbaris J; Tseng A; Masoudi A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2701-9. PubMed ID: 23972429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of pathological fracture of the femoral shaft with an osteolytic lesion using a computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method.
Chiba D; Mori Y; Sano H; Kishimoto K; Hatori M; Takahashi A; Nakajo S; Itoi E
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Jul; 21(4):530-538. PubMed ID: 27142243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of a new carbon fiber/flax/epoxy bone fracture plate shows less stress shielding compared to a standard clinical metal plate.
Bagheri ZS; Tavakkoli Avval P; Bougherara H; Aziz MS; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Sep; 136(9):091002. PubMed ID: 24828985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interfragmentary lag screw and locking plate combination in simple distal femoral fractures: A finite element analysis.
Zhang J; Wei Y; Li G; Wang J; Xu Y
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2021 Jan; 55(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 33650504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Location of atypical femoral fracture can be determined by tensile stress distribution influenced by femoral bowing and neck-shaft angle: a CT-based nonlinear finite element analysis model for the assessment of femoral shaft loading stress.
Oh Y; Fujita K; Wakabayashi Y; Kurosa Y; Okawa A
Injury; 2017 Dec; 48(12):2736-2743. PubMed ID: 28982480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.
Bouxsein ML; Zysset P; Glüer CC; McClung M; Biver E; Pierroz DD; Ferrari SL;
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Mar; 31(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 31900541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-Neck Osteoplasty has Minor Effect on the Strength of an Ovine Cam-FAI Model: In Vitro and Finite Element Analyses.
Maquer G; Bürki A; Nuss K; Zysset PK; Tannast M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2633-2640. PubMed ID: 27535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of the femoral diaphysis of fresh-frozen cadavers with computed tomography and mechanical testing.
Wako Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Miura M; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Yoshino K; Orita S; Inage K; Ohtori S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 13(1):192. PubMed ID: 30064512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice.
Eggermont F; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; van der Geest ICM; de Jong MAA; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Tanck E
Bone Joint Res; 2018 Jun; 7(6):430-439. PubMed ID: 30034797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects.
Anez-Bustillos L; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A; Tanck E
Bone; 2014 Jan; 58():160-7. PubMed ID: 24145305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
