These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34012293)

  • 41. The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: a comparison of synthetic femurs withfinite element analysis.
    Bougherara H; Zdero R; Miric M; Shah S; Hardisty M; Zalzal P; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 19405436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interlocked Pins Increase Strength by a Lateral Spread of Load in Femoral Neck Fixation: a Cadaver Study.
    Brattgjerd JE; Niratisairak S; Steen H; Strømsøe K
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2021; 88(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 33960928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect.
    Coquim J; Clemenzi J; Salahi M; Sherif A; Tavakkoli Avval P; Shah S; Schemitsch EH; Bagheri ZS; Bougherara H; Zdero R
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4650308. PubMed ID: 30420962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.
    Matsuyama K; Ishidou Y; Guo YM; Kakoi H; Setoguchi T; Nagano S; Kawamura I; Maeda S; Komiya S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.
    Matsuura Y; Giambini H; Ogawa Y; Fang Z; Thoreson AR; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; An KN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):E1291-6. PubMed ID: 25077904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Femoral fracture type can be predicted from femoral structure: A finite element study validated by digital volume correlation experiments.
    Ridzwan MIZ; Sukjamsri C; Pal B; van Arkel RJ; Bell A; Khanna M; Baskaradas A; Abel R; Boughton O; Cobb J; Hansen UN
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Mar; 36(3):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28762563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fatigue creep damage at the cement-bone interface: an experimental and a micro-mechanical finite element study.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Miller MA; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2513-9. PubMed ID: 19682690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.
    Sivasundaram R; Shah S; Ahmadi S; Wunder JS; Schemitsch EH; Ferguson PC; Zdero R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):e174-80. PubMed ID: 23249892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
    Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the Failure Initiation in the Proximal Human Femur Under Simulated Sideways Fall.
    Bahaloo H; Enns-Bray WS; Fleps I; Ariza O; Gilchrist S; Soyka RW; Guy P; Palsson H; Ferguson SJ; Cripton PA; Helgason B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 46(2):270-283. PubMed ID: 29181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Density-Dependent Material and Failure Criteria Equations Highly Affect the Accuracy and Precision of QCT/FEA-Based Predictions of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Properties.
    Prado M; Rezaei A; Giambini H
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 49(2):663-672. PubMed ID: 32820381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
    Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw.
    Rupprecht M; Grossterlinden L; Ruecker AH; de Oliveira AN; Sellenschloh K; Nüchtern J; Püschel K; Morlock M; Rueger JM; Lehmann W
    J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 21768904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation plating constructs on local stiffness, load transfer, and bone strains.
    Chen X; Andreassen TE; Myers CA; Clary CW; Coombs D; DeWall RJ; Fritz B; Bracey DN; Hedge V; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104960. PubMed ID: 34794043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of interlocking nail constructs and double plating for fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures in immature horses.
    Radcliffe RM; Lopez MJ; Turner TA; Watkins JP; Radcliffe CH; Markel MD
    Vet Surg; 2001; 30(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 11230773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis.
    Shefelbine SJ; Simon U; Claes L; Gold A; Gabet Y; Bab I; Müller R; Augat P
    Bone; 2005 Mar; 36(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 15777656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predicting the stiffness and strength of human femurs with real metastatic tumors.
    Yosibash Z; Plitman Mayo R; Dahan G; Trabelsi N; Amir G; Milgrom C
    Bone; 2014 Dec; 69():180-90. PubMed ID: 25284156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.
    Sternheim A; Giladi O; Gortzak Y; Drexler M; Salai M; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C; Yosibash Z
    Bone; 2018 May; 110():215-220. PubMed ID: 29475110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Structural consequences of endosteal metastatic lesions in long bones.
    Hipp JA; McBroom RJ; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 2795323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Subject specific finite element modelling of periprosthetic femoral fractures in different load cases.
    Hennicke NS; Saemann M; Kluess D; Bader R; Sander M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105059. PubMed ID: 34995835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.