198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34012890)
1. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser
Jiang Z; Wang H; Luo DQ; Chen J
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(5):737-743. PubMed ID: 34012890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser
Liu HT; Zhou Z; Luo WQ; He WJ; Agbedia O; Wang JX; Huang JZ; Gao X; Kong M; Li M; Li L
Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(4):656-661. PubMed ID: 29675387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser
Xia LK; Ma J; Liu HN; Shi C; Huang Q
Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(3):470-477. PubMed ID: 29600182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.
Yin Y; Lu Y; Xiang A; Fu Y; Zhao Y; Li Y; Hu T; Du K; Hu S; Fu Q; Wu X; Wen D
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):292. PubMed ID: 34340669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of choroidal thickness in high myopic eyes after FS-LASIK versus implantable collamer lens implantation with swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Zhang J; He FL; Liu Y; Fan XQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):773-781. PubMed ID: 32420225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia.
Sanders D; Vukich JA
Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 17172886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and Safety of Hole Implantable Collamer Lens in Comparison with Original Implantable Collamer Lens in Patients with Moderate to High Myopia.
Naripthaphan P; Pachimkul P; Chantra S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Feb; 100 Suppl 1():S48-55. PubMed ID: 29927184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser for myopia: comparison using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
Pérez-Vives C; Albarrán-Diego C; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Apr; 77(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 25076475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia.
Wu Y; Huang Y; Wang SH; Wang GQ; Yu AM; Zhao SZ; Wei RH; Yang RB; Zhang C
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):502-509. PubMed ID: 35310064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia.
Zhang J; Feng Q; Ding W; Peng Y; Long K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):243. PubMed ID: 32560634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implantable collamer lens for residual refractive error after corneal refractive surgery.
Chen X; Wang XY; Zhang X; Chen Z; Zhou XT
Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(10):1421-1426. PubMed ID: 27803858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matched population comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens and standard LASIK for myopia of -3.00 to -7.88 diopters.
Sanders DR
J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):537-53. PubMed ID: 17598571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Han T; Xu Y; Han X; Zeng L; Shang J; Chen X; Zhou X
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):565-568. PubMed ID: 30061116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Collamer toric implantable [corrected] contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Komatsu M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1687-93. PubMed ID: 18812119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contralateral eye comparison of the long-term visual quality and stability between implantable collamer lens and laser refractive surgery for myopia.
Chen X; Guo L; Han T; Wu L; Wang X; Zhou X
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 97(3):e471-e478. PubMed ID: 30187653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binocular imbalance in patients after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation or femtosecond laser-assisted
Ye Y; Zhang Z; Niu L; Shi W; Wang X; Yan L; Zhou X; Zhao J
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1204792. PubMed ID: 37325042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable Collamer lens and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
Pérez-Vives C; Dominguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; ():0. PubMed ID: 22865405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of accommodation and accommodative micro-fluctuation after implantable collamer lens and LASIK surgery for myopia.
Li L; Zhang B; Wang Z
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 34983448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vector Analysis of the Effects of FS-LASIK and Toric ICL for Moderate to High Astigmatism Correction.
Chen K; Hu Z; Zhou J; Yu T; Xu J; Bai J; Ye J
J Ophthalmol; 2018; 2018():6952710. PubMed ID: 30147948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FDA-Reported Visual and Refractive Outcomes of the Toric ICL Lens, SMILE, and Topography-Guided LASIK for the Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
Moshirfar M; Somani AN; Motlagh MN; Vaidyanathan U; Sumsion JS; Barnes JR; Ronquillo YC
J Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 35(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 31710371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
