These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3401323)

  • 41. Automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology.
    Mills RP
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1991; 31(4):51-70. PubMed ID: 1743895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 98(9):1560-3. PubMed ID: 7425915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual evoked potential abnormalities in chiasmal lesions.
    Brecelj J; Denislic M; Skrbec M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Oct; 73(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 2638624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stimulus motion increases measured visual field extent in children 3.5 to 30 months of age.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Mohan KM; Weidenbacher HJ; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 77(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 10701806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does rate of stimulus presentation affect measured visual field extent in infants and toddlers?
    Mohan KM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Delaney SM; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 10333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Objective visual field measurement using "pupil perimetry"].
    Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Mukuno K; Ishikawa S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 100(10):825-31. PubMed ID: 8937108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Octopus perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic diseases. A contribution to the problem of optimal program choice based on 427 cases].
    Graf M; Meienberg O
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Jun; 198(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 1895723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recording and Analysis of Goldmann Kinetic Visual Fields.
    Talib M; Dagnelie G; Boon CJF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1715():327-338. PubMed ID: 29188525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.
    Dobson V; Baldwin MB; Mohan KM; Delaney SM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Oct; 80(10):698-702. PubMed ID: 14560120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Visual evoked potentials in children with gliomas of the optic nerve and chiasm].
    Maĭorchik VE; Arkhipova NA; Bokeriia ZO
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1988; (1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3364110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A simplified stimulus value notation using preferred stimulus combinations for Goldmann quantitative perimetry.
    Wirtschafter JD; Prater BN
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1978; 23(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 734614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.
    Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.
    Phu J; Al-Saleem N; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
    J Vis; 2016 Nov; 16(14):5. PubMed ID: 27829104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
    Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Goldmann perimetry in acromegaly: a survey of 307 cases from 1951 through 1996.
    Rivoal O; Brézin AP; Feldman-Billard S; Luton JP
    Ophthalmology; 2000 May; 107(5):991-7. PubMed ID: 10811095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Visual field versus visual evoked potentials in maculopathies and optic neuropathies.
    Wang Y; Wu DZ; Wu LZ; Chen YZ
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1989 Jun; 5(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 2485746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Longitudinal Danish High Myopia Study, Cohort 1948: at age 66 years visual ability is only occasionally affected by visual field defects.
    Fledelius HC; Jacobsen N; Li XQ; Goldschmidt E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 97(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 30284371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.