These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Thomes BE; Callaghan TA Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():1529-34. PubMed ID: 23926419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of the In Vitro Predisposition to Glistening Formation in One Manufacturer's Acrylic Intraocular Lenses Made in Different Decades. Wang Q; Yildirim TM; Schickhardt SK; Łabuz G; Khoramnia R; Merz PR; Son HS; Munro DJ; Friedmann E; Auffarth GU Ophthalmol Ther; 2021 Mar; 10(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 33544374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Objective Assessment of Postoperative Results of Intraocular Lenses]. Nekolová J; Langrová H; Rozsíval P; Jirásková N Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(3):66-70. PubMed ID: 27658973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of microvacuole formation in five intraocular lens models made of different hydrophobic materials. Yildirim TM; Schickhardt SK; Wang Q; Friedmann E; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250860. PubMed ID: 33930084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges. Cecchini P; D'Aloisio R; De Giacinto C; Turco G; Tognetto D Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 31624987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glistening formation in a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. Yildirim TM; Fang H; Schickhardt SK; Wang Q; Merz PR; Auffarth GU BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 20(1):186. PubMed ID: 32375708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glistenings in foldable intraocular lenses. Tognetto D; Toto L; Sanguinetti G; Ravalico G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1211-6. PubMed ID: 12106730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group. Abela-Formanek C; Amon M; Schauersberger J; Kruger A; Nepp J; Schild G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1141-52. PubMed ID: 12106722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. Abela-Formanek C; Amon M; Schild G; Schauersberger J; Heinze G; Kruger A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jan; 28(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 11777710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of glistenings formation and their effect on forward light scatter between the Acrysof SN60WF and Eternity Natural Uni NW-60 intraocular lenses. Philippaki E; O'Brart DP; Hull CC BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2020; 5(1):e000399. PubMed ID: 32154371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glistenings, anterior/posterior capsular opacification and incidence of Nd:YAG laser treatments with two aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses - a long-term intra-individual study. Johansson B Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):671-677. PubMed ID: 28371401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of glistenings on the optical quality of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. Weindler JN; Łabuz G; Yildirim TM; Tandogan T; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 31003800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacterial adhesion to rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses: in vitro study. Schauersberger J; Amon M; Aichinger D; Georgopoulos A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 12648650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]