These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34013467)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of in vitro accelerated glistening formation in foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
    Tandogan T; Auffarth GU; Choi CY; Son HS; Khoramnia R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):3073-3080. PubMed ID: 34013467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-vitro glistening formation in six different foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
    Tandogan T; Auffarth GU; Son HS; Merz P; Choi CY; Khoramnia R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 33685428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of glistening formation among hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses(1).
    Gregori NZ; Spencer TS; Mamalis N; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1262-8. PubMed ID: 12106738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Thomes BE; Callaghan TA
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():1529-34. PubMed ID: 23926419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of the In Vitro Predisposition to Glistening Formation in One Manufacturer's Acrylic Intraocular Lenses Made in Different Decades.
    Wang Q; Yildirim TM; Schickhardt SK; Łabuz G; Khoramnia R; Merz PR; Son HS; Munro DJ; Friedmann E; Auffarth GU
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2021 Mar; 10(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 33544374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Objective Assessment of Postoperative Results of Intraocular Lenses].
    Nekolová J; Langrová H; Rozsíval P; Jirásková N
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(3):66-70. PubMed ID: 27658973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of microvacuole formation in five intraocular lens models made of different hydrophobic materials.
    Yildirim TM; Schickhardt SK; Wang Q; Friedmann E; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250860. PubMed ID: 33930084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges.
    Cecchini P; D'Aloisio R; De Giacinto C; Turco G; Tognetto D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 31624987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glistening formation in a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.
    Yildirim TM; Fang H; Schickhardt SK; Wang Q; Merz PR; Auffarth GU
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 20(1):186. PubMed ID: 32375708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glistenings in foldable intraocular lenses.
    Tognetto D; Toto L; Sanguinetti G; Ravalico G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1211-6. PubMed ID: 12106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group.
    Abela-Formanek C; Amon M; Schauersberger J; Kruger A; Nepp J; Schild G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1141-52. PubMed ID: 12106722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.
    Abela-Formanek C; Amon M; Schild G; Schauersberger J; Heinze G; Kruger A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jan; 28(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 11777710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical quality measurements of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Sakuraba T
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):824-6. PubMed ID: 17061722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glistening Formation and Light Scattering in Six Hydrophobic-Acrylic Intraocular Lenses.
    Łabuz G; Knebel D; Auffarth GU; Fang H; van den Berg TJ; Yildirim TM; Son HS; Khoramnia R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 196():112-120. PubMed ID: 30189220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equilibrium water content and glistenings in acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Miyata A; Yaguchi S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1768-72. PubMed ID: 15313305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological compatibility of polymethyl methacrylate, hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Barbour W; Saika S; Miyamoto T; Ohnishi Y
    Ophthalmic Res; 2005; 37(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 16037680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of glistenings formation and their effect on forward light scatter between the Acrysof SN60WF and Eternity Natural Uni NW-60 intraocular lenses.
    Philippaki E; O'Brart DP; Hull CC
    BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2020; 5(1):e000399. PubMed ID: 32154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glistenings, anterior/posterior capsular opacification and incidence of Nd:YAG laser treatments with two aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses - a long-term intra-individual study.
    Johansson B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):671-677. PubMed ID: 28371401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of glistenings on the optical quality of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.
    Weindler JN; Łabuz G; Yildirim TM; Tandogan T; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 31003800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial adhesion to rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses: in vitro study.
    Schauersberger J; Amon M; Aichinger D; Georgopoulos A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 12648650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.