156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34014672)
1. VAD-MM/GBSA: A Variable Atomic Dielectric MM/GBSA Model for Improved Accuracy in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.
Wang E; Fu W; Jiang D; Sun H; Wang J; Zhang X; Weng G; Liu H; Tao P; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jun; 61(6):2844-2856. PubMed ID: 34014672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Evaluation of MM/GBSA Based on a Variable Dielectric GB Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.
Wang E; Liu H; Wang J; Weng G; Sun H; Wang Z; Kang Y; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5353-5365. PubMed ID: 32175734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions.
Wang E; Weng G; Sun H; Du H; Zhu F; Chen F; Wang Z; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(35):18958-18969. PubMed ID: 31453590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.
Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uni-GBSA: an open-source and web-based automatic workflow to perform MM/GB(PB)SA calculations for virtual screening.
Yang M; Bo Z; Xu T; Xu B; Wang D; Zheng H
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jul; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 37328705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Could MM-GBSA be accurate enough for calculation of absolute protein/ligand binding free energies?
Mulakala C; Viswanadhan VN
J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Nov; 46():41-51. PubMed ID: 24121518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Different Parameters on the Accuracy of Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Complexes with the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area Method.
Valdés-Tresanco ME; Valdés-Tresanco MS; Moreno E; Valiente PA
J Phys Chem B; 2023 Feb; 127(4):944-954. PubMed ID: 36661180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An efficient computational method for calculating ligand binding affinities.
Suenaga A; Okimoto N; Hirano Y; Fukui K
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42846. PubMed ID: 22916168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches.
Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of Binding Free Energy of Protein-Ligand Complexes with a Hybrid Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area and Machine Learning Method.
Dong L; Qu X; Zhao Y; Wang B
ACS Omega; 2021 Dec; 6(48):32938-32947. PubMed ID: 34901645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. farPPI: a webserver for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding structures for small-molecule PPI inhibitors by MM/PB(GB)SA methods.
Wang Z; Wang X; Li Y; Lei T; Wang E; Li D; Kang Y; Zhu F; Hou T
Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 35(10):1777-1779. PubMed ID: 30329012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions.
Mishra SK; Koča J
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches.
Srivastava HK; Sastry GN
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors.
Sasmal S; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 31781990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
