These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34014755)

  • 1. Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.
    Scotti PS; Hong Y; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2506-2524. PubMed ID: 34014755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2300-2323. PubMed ID: 35191726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidance of attention by working memory is a matter of representational fidelity.
    Williams JR; Brady TF; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):202-231. PubMed ID: 35084932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.
    Pertzov Y; Manohar S; Husain M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):528-536. PubMed ID: 27668485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory Fidelity Reveals Qualitative Changes in Interactions Between Items in Visual Working Memory.
    Lively Z; Robinson MM; Benjamin AS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1426-1441. PubMed ID: 34406899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breaking the cardinal rule: The impact of interitem interaction and attentional priority on the cardinal biases in orientation working memory.
    Bae GY
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2186-2194. PubMed ID: 34658001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.
    Taylor R; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(32):7132-7142. PubMed ID: 30006363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties.
    Utochkin IS; Brady TF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):458-473. PubMed ID: 32191111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heading Direction Tracks Internally Directed Selective Attention in Visual Working Memory.
    Thom JL; Nobre AC; van Ede F; Draschkow D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 May; 35(5):856-868. PubMed ID: 36802368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion.
    Johnson JS; van Lamsweerde AE; Dineva E; Spencer JP
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17756. PubMed ID: 36272987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
    Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The passive state: A protective mechanism for information in working memory tasks.
    Zhang J; Ye C; Sun HJ; Zhou J; Liang T; Li Y; Liu Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 34694828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial-by-trial mouse trajectory predicts variance in precision across working memory representations: A critical reanalysis of Hao et al. (2021).
    Park HB; Zhang W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2181-2191. PubMed ID: 35668294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual objects interact differently during encoding and memory maintenance.
    Czoschke S; Peters B; Rahm B; Kaiser J; Bledowski C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1241-1257. PubMed ID: 31512114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of meaning in visual working memory: Real-world objects, but not simple features, benefit from deeper processing.
    Brady TF; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):942-958. PubMed ID: 33764123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic in-flight shifts of working memory resources across saccades.
    Udale R; Tran MT; Manohar S; Husain M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 35073141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory.
    Suchow JW; Fougnie D; Brady TF; Alvarez GA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):2071-9. PubMed ID: 24894917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How selection in the mind is different from attention to the world.
    Kong G; Fougnie D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Mar; 151(3):542-554. PubMed ID: 34498909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young children monitor the fidelity of visual working memory.
    Applin JB; Kibbe MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):808-819. PubMed ID: 33151715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.