BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015072)

  • 1. Utilization of diagnostic ultrasound in the detection of hip fracture.
    Chiu YH; Shyu SG
    Med Ultrason; 2021 May; 23(2):240-241. PubMed ID: 34015072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis of an Occult Hip Fracture by Point-of-Care Ultrasound.
    Medero Colon R; Chilstrom ML
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 49(6):916-9. PubMed ID: 26403984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hip fracture discrimination by imaging ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus.
    Prins SH; Lauritzen J; Jørgensen HL; Simonsen L; Hassager C
    Clin Physiol; 1999 Sep; 19(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 10516893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discriminative ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with hip or distal forearm fractures.
    Cesme F; Esmaeilzadeh S; Oral A
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct; 50(5):548-553. PubMed ID: 27680751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry densitometry in women with hip fracture.
    Mautalen C; Vega E; González D; Carrilero P; Otaño A; Silberman F
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Sep; 57(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8574930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hip and nonvertebral fracture prediction in nursing home patients: role of bone ultrasound and bone marker measurements.
    Dobnig H; Piswanger-Sölkner JC; Obermayer-Pietsch B; Tiran A; Strele A; Maier E; Maritschnegg P; Riedmüller G; Brueck C; Fahrleitner-Pammer A
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2007 May; 92(5):1678-86. PubMed ID: 17311861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective study.
    Hans D; Schott AM; Duboeuf F; Durosier C; Meunier PJ;
    Bone; 2004 Aug; 35(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 15268884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius.
    Pluskiewicz W; Drozdzowska B
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Mar; 13(3):265; author reply 265. PubMed ID: 11991448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.
    Barkmann R; Dencks S; Laugier P; Padilla F; Brixen K; Ryg J; Seekamp A; Mahlke L; Bremer A; Heller M; Glüer CC
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jun; 21(6):969-76. PubMed ID: 19693640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is time since hip fracture influencing the discrimination between fractured and nonfractured subjects as assessed at the calcaneum by three technologically different quantitative ultrasound devices?
    Hans D; Allaoua S; Genton L; Delmi M; Vuagnat H; Rizzoli R; Tahintzi-Zawadynski S; Perron C; Pichard C; Slosman DO
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Dec; 71(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 12232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis in female postmenopausal patients with cervical and trochanteric fracture.
    Dretakis EK; Kontakis GM; Steriopoulos K; Dretakis K; Kouvidis G
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Dec; 57(6):419-21. PubMed ID: 8581872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathologic Hip Fracture Demonstrated on Ultrasound.
    Johnson SE; Winemiller MH
    PM R; 2020 Feb; 12(2):219-220. PubMed ID: 31304672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.
    Johnell O; Kanis JA; Oden A; Johansson H; De Laet C; Delmas P; Eisman JA; Fujiwara S; Kroger H; Mellstrom D; Meunier PJ; Melton LJ; O'Neill T; Pols H; Reeve J; Silman A; Tenenhouse A
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1185-94. PubMed ID: 15940371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?
    Hans D; Srivastav SK; Singal C; Barkmann R; Njeh CF; Kantorovich E; Glüer CC; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1999 Apr; 14(4):644-51. PubMed ID: 10234587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound bone densitometry of os calcis in elderly Japanese women with hip fracture.
    Sakata S; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Inoue T
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Jan; 60(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9030471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study.
    Schott AM; Hans D; Duboeuf F; Dargent-Molina P; Hajri T; Bréart G; Meunier PJ;
    Bone; 2005 Dec; 37(6):858-63. PubMed ID: 16226929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative ultrasound and hip fractures?
    Pluskiewicz W
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1311; author reply 1312. PubMed ID: 17388727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Role of bone ultrasound in predicting hip fracture risk in women 70 years or older: results of the SEMOF study and comparison with literature data].
    Krieg MA; Comuz J; Ruffieux C; Burckhardt P
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2004 Feb; 124(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 15095612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between low-frequency ultrasound and hip fractures -- comparison with DXA-based BMD.
    Määttä M; Moilanen P; Timonen J; Pulkkinen P; Korpelainen R; Jämsä T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jun; 15():208. PubMed ID: 24934318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.