These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015509)

  • 1. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data.
    Wang G; Cheng Y; Chen M; Wang X
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106440. PubMed ID: 34015509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Viechtbauer W; Bender R; Bowden J; Knapp G; Kuss O; Higgins JP; Langan D; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 26332144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events.
    Jiang T; Cao B; Shan G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32349702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Order-restricted inference for means with missing values.
    Wang H; Zhong PS
    Biometrics; 2017 Sep; 73(3):972-980. PubMed ID: 28182830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence function-based empirical likelihood for inference of quantile medical costs with censored data.
    Jeyarajah J; Wei G; Qin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1913-1934. PubMed ID: 31595834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood-Based Random-Effect Meta-Analysis of Binary Events.
    Amatya A; Bhaumik DK; Normand SL; Greenhouse J; Kaizar E; Neelon B; Gibbons RD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):984-1004. PubMed ID: 24918874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
    Kojima M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC; Bakbergenuly I; Newman J
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):711-730. PubMed ID: 33969638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel empirical likelihood inference for the mean difference with right-censored data.
    Alemdjrodo K; Zhao Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 34623199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.
    Honvoh GD; Cho H; Kosorok MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):328. PubMed ID: 36550398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.