BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015696)

  • 21. Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units.
    Sodhi N; Patel Y; Berger RJ; Newman JM; Anis HK; Ehiorobo JO; Khlopas A; Desai R; Hollern DA; Schwartz JM; Paulino CB; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():363-368. PubMed ID: 31373381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Crandall DG; Revella J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
    Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of anterior vs. posterior approach to single-level lumbar spinal fusion with interbody device: An analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.
    De Stefano F; Haddad H; Mayo T; Nouman M; Fiani B
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 212():107061. PubMed ID: 34863055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.
    Hofstetter CP; Hofer AS; Levi AD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):457-75. PubMed ID: 26613283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trends in lumbar interbody fusion: A study of American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) candidate data.
    Childs S; Bakhsh W; Thirukumaran C; Emery S; Rubery P; Mesfin A
    Surg Neurol Int; 2023; 14():426. PubMed ID: 38213447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.
    Humphreys SC; Hodges SD; Patwardhan AG; Eck JC; Murphy RB; Covington LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 11242386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients.
    Yun DJ; Yu JW; Jeon SH; Lee HC; Lee SH
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e746-e755. PubMed ID: 29309972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.