139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015696)
41. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.
Hackenberg L; Halm H; Bullmann V; Vieth V; Schneider M; Liljenqvist U
Eur Spine J; 2005 Aug; 14(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15672243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Fischer G; Faundez A; Wu W; Transfeldt E
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20043769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].
Fleege C; Rickert M; Rauschmann M
Orthopade; 2015 Feb; 44(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 25588711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
Jiang SD; Chen JW; Jiang LS
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Sep; 132(9):1259-66. PubMed ID: 22622795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of Anterior Approach and Posterior Approach to Instrumented Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-analysis.
Cho JY; Goh TS; Son SM; Kim DS; Lee JS
World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e286-e293. PubMed ID: 31129223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Procedures employing interbody devices and multi-level fusion require target price adjustment to build a sustainable lumbar fusion bundled payment model.
Lambrechts MJ; Issa TZ; Lee Y; D'Antonio ND; Kalra A; Sherman M; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 37302417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.
Robertson PA; Armstrong WA; Woods DL; Rawlinson JJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1350-E1357. PubMed ID: 30383726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.
Kobayashi K; Ando K; Kato F; Kanemura T; Sato K; Hachiya Y; Matsubara Y; Kamiya M; Sakai Y; Yagi H; Shinjo R; Nishida Y; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
Eur Spine J; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1972-1980. PubMed ID: 29423887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Characterizing the risk and outcome profiles of lumbar fusion procedures in patients with opioid use disorders: a step toward improving enhanced recovery protocols for a unique patient population.
Martini ML; Nistal DA; Deutsch BC; Caridi JM
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E12. PubMed ID: 30933913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels.
Ames CP; Acosta FL; Chi J; Iyengar J; Muiru W; Acaroglu E; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):E562-6. PubMed ID: 16205329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
