BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015696)

  • 61. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
    Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.
    Li L; Liu Y; Zhang P; Lei T; Li J; Shen Y
    J Int Med Res; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1424-1429. PubMed ID: 27811052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: A STROBE-compliant observational study.
    Zhang D; Mao K; Qiang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e8011. PubMed ID: 28906383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Matsuda S
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lan T; Hu SY; Zhang YT; Zheng YC; Zhang R; Shen Z; Yang XJ
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():86-93. PubMed ID: 29367001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison of TLIF with rhBMP-2 versus no TLIF and higher posterolateral rhBMP-2 dose at L5-S1 for long fusions to the sacrum with sacropelvic fixation in patients with primary adult deformity.
    Rahman RK; Buchowski JM; Stephens B; Dorward IG; Koester LA; Bridwell KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24108280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Technical Consideration for TLIF Cage Retrieval and Deformity Correction With Anterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Revision Surgeries.
    Janjua MB; Ackshota N; Arlet V
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):633-640. PubMed ID: 31202382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Analysis of Cost and 30-Day Outcomes in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Less Invasive, Stand-Alone Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.
    Hartman C; Hemphill C; Godzik J; Walker CT; Wewel JT; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e1037-e1040. PubMed ID: 30414525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion--systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phan K; Thayaparan GK; Mobbs RJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2015; 29(5):705-11. PubMed ID: 25968330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Strom RG; Bae J; Mizutani J; Valone F; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 27341052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.
    Karikari IO; Isaacs RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26 Suppl):S294-301. PubMed ID: 21160393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients.
    Salehi SA; Tawk R; Ganju A; LaMarca F; Liu JC; Ondra SL
    Neurosurgery; 2004 Feb; 54(2):368-74; discussion 374. PubMed ID: 14744283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation.
    Khanna R; McDevitt JL; Abecassis ZA; Smith ZA; Koski TR; Fessler RG; Dahdaleh NS
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 94():255-260. PubMed ID: 27423195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.