These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34015770)

  • 1. Comparison of CT image quality between the AIDR 3D and FIRST iterative reconstruction algorithms: an assessment based on phantom measurements and clinical images.
    Leon S; Olguin E; Schaeffer C; Olguin C; Verma N; Mohammed TL; Grajo J; Arreola M
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jun; 66(12):. PubMed ID: 34015770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forward-Projected Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Screening Low-Dose Chest CT: Comparison With Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D.
    Hassani C; Ronco A; Prosper AE; Dissanayake S; Cen SY; Lee C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 30040468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm in CT: effect on image quality compared with filtered back projection in body phantoms of different sizes.
    Kim M; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Son H; Choi JW; Han JK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 24644409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
    Nishiyama Y; Tada K; Nishiyama Y; Mori H; Maruyama M; Katsube T; Yamamoto N; Kanayama H; Yamamoto Y; Kitagaki H
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 27531216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of hybrid iterative reconstruction, with and without noise power spectrum models: A phantom study.
    Minamishima K; Sugisawa K; Yamada Y; Jinzaki M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):318-325. PubMed ID: 29493077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two versions of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on CT image quality and dose reduction: A phantom study.
    Greffier J; Dabli D; Frandon J; Hamard A; Belaouni A; Akessoul P; Fuamba Y; Le Roy J; Guiu B; Beregi JP
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5743-5755. PubMed ID: 34418110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
    Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography.
    Xu J; Wang S; Wang X; Wang Y; Xue H; Yan J; Xu M; Jin Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110388. PubMed ID: 35714492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.
    Greffier J; Dabli D; Hamard A; Belaouni A; Akessoul P; Frandon J; Beregi JP
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):229-243. PubMed ID: 34993074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
    Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR).
    Yasaka K; Kamiya K; Irie R; Maeda E; Sato J; Ohtomo K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160114. PubMed ID: 27268082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between uniform and anatomically realistic phantoms-influences on CT image quality assessment.
    Conzelmann J; Genske U; Emig A; Scheel M; Hamm B; Jahnke P
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 34476563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
    Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep learning reconstruction improves radiomics feature stability and discriminative power in abdominal CT imaging: a phantom study.
    Michallek F; Genske U; Niehues SM; Hamm B; Jahnke P
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4587-4595. PubMed ID: 35174400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.