BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34016701)

  • 1. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size
    Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 34016701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
    BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy as primary treatment. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open approach. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manzour N; Núñez-Cordoba JM; Chiva L; Chacón E; Boria F; Vara-García J; Rodriguez-Velandia YP; Minguez JA; Alcazar JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):455-460. PubMed ID: 34848071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Li LY; Wen LY; Park SH; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 53(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 33070554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
    Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
    Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.