These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34017362)

  • 1. Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions.
    Long RW; Whitehill A; Habel A; Urbanski S; Halliday H; Colón M; Kaushik S; Landis MS
    Atmos Meas Tech; 2021 Mar; 14(3):1783-1800. PubMed ID: 34017362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary of PM
    Long RW; Urbanski SP; Lincoln E; Colón M; Kaushik S; Krug JD; Vanderpool RW; Landis MS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(4):295-312. PubMed ID: 36716322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems.
    Landis MS; Long RW; Krug J; Colón M; Vanderpool R; Habel A; Urbanski SP
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2021; 247():. PubMed ID: 33889052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.
    Leston AR; Ollison WM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.
    Spicer CW; Joseph DW; Ollison WM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21141429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of small form factor, filter-based PM
    Krug J; Long R; Colón M; Habel A; Urbanski S; Landis MS
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2021 Nov; 265():1-8. PubMed ID: 35153533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring.
    Leston AR; Ollison WM; Spicer CW; Satola J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Oct; 55(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 16295271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposures to O3, PM2.5, and CO.
    Chang LT; Suh HH; Wolfson JM; Misra K; Allen GA; Catalano PJ; Koutrakis P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1414-22. PubMed ID: 11686245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter to assess regional wildland fire smoke and air quality management.
    Schweizer D; Cisneros R; Traina S; Ghezzehei TA; Shaw G
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Oct; 201():345-356. PubMed ID: 28692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Particulate Pb emission factors from wildland fires in the United States.
    Holder AL; Rao V; Kovalcik K; Virtaranta L
    Atmos Environ X; 2023 Dec; 20():1-8. PubMed ID: 38269205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data.
    Baker KR; Woody MC; Valin L; Szykman J; Yates EL; Iraci LT; Choi HD; Soja AJ; Koplitz SN; Zhou L; Campuzano-Jost P; Jimenez JL; Hair JW
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1137-1149. PubMed ID: 29801207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
    Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using wildland fire smoke modeling data in gerontological health research (California, 2007-2018).
    Koman PD; Billmire M; Baker KR; Carter JM; Thelen BJ; French NHF; Bell SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 3):156403. PubMed ID: 35660427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NO
    Allen C; Carrico CM; Gomez SL; Andersen PC; Turnipseed AA; Williford CJ; Birks JW; Salisbury D; Carrion R; Gates D; Macias F; Rahn T; Aiken AC; Dubey MK
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1175-1189. PubMed ID: 29889623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of US wildland fires on ozone and particulate matter: a comparison of measurements and CMAQ model predictions from 2008 to 2012.
    Wilkins JL; Pouliot G; Foley K; Appel W; Pierce T
    Int J Wildland Fire; 2018; 27(10):. PubMed ID: 33424209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impacts of fire smoke plumes on regional air quality, 2006-2013.
    Larsen AE; Reich BJ; Ruminski M; Rappold AG
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 28(4):319-327. PubMed ID: 29288254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential air toxics hot spots in truck terminals and cabs.
    Smith TJ; Davis ME; Hart JE; Blicharz A; Laden F; Garshick E;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Dec; (172):5-82. PubMed ID: 23409510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of occupational smoke exposure among wildland firefighters in the midwestern United States.
    Wu CM; Song CC; Chartier R; Kremer J; Naeher L; Adetona O
    Environ Res; 2021 Feb; 193():110541. PubMed ID: 33249041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fuel layer specific pollutant emission factors for fire prone forest ecosystems of the western U.S. and Canada.
    Urbanski SP; Long RW; Halliday H; Lincoln EN; Habel A; Landis MS
    Atmos Environ X; 2022 Dec; 16():1-17. PubMed ID: 36960321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring.
    Williams EJ; Fehsenfeld FC; Jobson BT; Kuster WC; Goldan PD; Stutz J; McClenny WA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(18):5755-62. PubMed ID: 17007137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.