253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34018242)
1. Correlations Between Handshape and Movement in Sign Languages.
Napoli DJ; Ferrara C
Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12944. PubMed ID: 34018242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modality-dependent and -independent factors in the organisation of the signed language lexicon: insights from semantic and phonological fluency tasks in BSL.
Marshall C; Rowley K; Atkinson J
J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Oct; 43(5):587-610. PubMed ID: 24043510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sign phonological parameters modulate parafoveal preview effects in deaf readers.
Thierfelder P; Wigglesworth G; Tang G
Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104286. PubMed ID: 32521285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASL Phonological Fluency: How Do Deaf Signers Retrieve and Produce Signs?
Beal JS; Bowman S
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2023 Mar; 28(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 36526438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task.
Bogliotti C; Aksen H; Isel F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0236729. PubMed ID: 33201887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes.
Ferrara C; Napoli DJ
Cogn Sci; 2019 Sep; 43(9):e12741. PubMed ID: 31529533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners.
Brentari D; Coppola M; Mazzoni L; Goldin-Meadow S
Nat Lang Linguist Theory; 2012 Feb; 30(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 23723534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Language modality shapes the dynamics of word and sign recognition.
Villameriel S; Costello B; Dias P; Giezen M; Carreiras M
Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103979. PubMed ID: 31234112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish.
Perlman M; Little H; Thompson B; Thompson RL
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1433. PubMed ID: 30154747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Iconicity in sign language production: Task matters.
Gimeno-Martínez M; Baus C
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Mar; 167():108166. PubMed ID: 35114219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Watching language grow in the manual modality: nominals, predicates, and handshapes.
Goldin-Meadow S; Brentari D; Coppola M; Horton L; Senghas A
Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():381-95. PubMed ID: 25546342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One grammar or two? Sign Languages and the Nature of Human Language.
Lillo-Martin DC; Gajewski J
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2014 Jul; 5(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 25013534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural Networks Supporting Phoneme Monitoring Are Modulated by Phonology but Not Lexicality or Iconicity: Evidence From British and Swedish Sign Language.
Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Kästner L; Cardin V; Woll B; Capek CM; Rönnberg J
Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():374. PubMed ID: 31695602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are form priming effects phonological or perceptual? Electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.
Meade G; Lee B; Massa N; Holcomb PJ; Midgley KJ; Emmorey K
Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104979. PubMed ID: 34906848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.
Newman AJ; Supalla T; Fernandez N; Newport EL; Bavelier D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(37):11684-9. PubMed ID: 26283352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing: the case of deaf children.
Ormel E; Hermans D; Knoors H; Verhoeven L
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(4):436-48. PubMed ID: 19620251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language.
Sehyr ZS; Emmorey K
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2502-2521. PubMed ID: 34918219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speakers aren't blank slates (with respect to sign-language phonology)!
Berent I; Gervain J
Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105347. PubMed ID: 36528980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurophysiological effects of frequency, length, phonological neighborhood density, and iconicity on sign recognition.
Zhang X; Cao H; Li H
Neuroreport; 2023 Dec; 34(17):817-824. PubMed ID: 37823434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Architecture design of a reinforcement environment for learning sign languages.
Naranjo-Zeledón L; Chacón-Rivas M; Peral J; Ferrández A
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e740. PubMed ID: 34722873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
