These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34018916)

  • 1. Patterns in transitions of visual attention during baseline driving and during interaction with visual-manual and voice-based interfaces.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Muñoz M; Dobres J; Kidd D; Reagan IJ
    Ergonomics; 2021 Nov; 64(11):1429-1451. PubMed ID: 34018916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Reagan I; Kidd D; Dobres J
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1565-1585. PubMed ID: 27110964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems.
    Mehler B; Kidd D; Reimer B; Reagan I; Dobres J; McCartt A
    Ergonomics; 2016 Mar; 59(3):344-67. PubMed ID: 26269281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative impact of smartwatch and smartphone use while driving on workload, attention, and driving performance.
    Perlman D; Samost A; Domel AG; Mehler B; Dobres J; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():8-16. PubMed ID: 30509540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
    Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and cognitive demands of manual and voice-based driving mode implementations on smartphones.
    Monk C; Sall R; Lester BD; Stephen Higgins J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jul; 187():107033. PubMed ID: 37099998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model for naturalistic glance behavior around Tesla Autopilot disengagements.
    Morando A; Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106348. PubMed ID: 34492560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does order matter? Investigating the effect of sequence on glance duration during on-road driving.
    Lee J; Roberts SC; Reimer B; Mehler B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171730. PubMed ID: 28158301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
    Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
    Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 25977319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving.
    Beckers N; Schreiner S; Bertrand P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():25-34. PubMed ID: 27633195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolating the Effect of Off-Road Glance Duration on Driving Performance: An Exemplar Study Comparing HDD and HUD in Different Driving Scenarios.
    Smith M; Bagalkotkar K; Gabbard JL; Large DR; Burnett G
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):833-845. PubMed ID: 34292078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.
    Simons-Morton BG; Guo F; Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; Pradhan AK
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S61-7. PubMed ID: 24759443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How safe is tuning a radio?: using the radio tuning task as a benchmark for distracted driving.
    Lee JY; Lee JD; Bärgman J; Lee J; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():29-37. PubMed ID: 29101787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
    Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.