These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34018953)
1. Cerebral palsy litigation after fifty years: A hoax on you. Sartwelle TP; Johnston JC; Arda B; Zebenigus M Indian J Med Ethics; 2020; V(4):1-15. PubMed ID: 34018953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A half century of electronic fetal monitoring and bioethics: silence speaks louder than words. Sartwelle TP; Johnston JC; Arda B Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol; 2017; 3():21. PubMed ID: 29201387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic fetal monitoring: physician liability and informed consent. Gilfix MG Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(1):31-90. PubMed ID: 6391159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series. Evans MI; Eden RD; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(15):2561-2569. PubMed ID: 29447043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The medical and legal risks of the electronic fetal monitor. Lent M Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 51(4):807-37. PubMed ID: 10557629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neonatal encephalopathy 2015: opportunity lost and words unspoken. Sartwelle TP; Johnston JC J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(9):1372-5. PubMed ID: 26067269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD006066. PubMed ID: 16856111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Historical controversy in health technology assessment: the case of electronic fetal monitoring. Banta DH; Thacker SB Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Nov; 56(11):707-19. PubMed ID: 11711906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Litigation related to intrapartum fetal surveillance. Schifrin BS; Soliman M; Koos B Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():87-97. PubMed ID: 26227999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Ethics of Teaching Physicians Electronic Fetal Monitoring: And Now for the Rest of the Story. Sartwelle TP; Johnston JC; Arda B Surg J (N Y); 2017 Jan; 3(1):e42-e47. PubMed ID: 28825019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury. Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cerebral palsy and perinatal asphyxia (II--Medicolegal implications and prevention)]. Boog G Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Mar; 39(3):146-73. PubMed ID: 21354846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring during Labor: A Critique and a Reply to Contemporary Proponents. Sartwelle TP; Johnston JC Surg J (N Y); 2018 Jan; 4(1):e23-e28. PubMed ID: 29527573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No-fault cerebral palsy insurance: an alternative to the obstetrical malpractice lottery. Freeman AD; Freeman JM J Health Polit Policy Law; 1989; 14(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 2614041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstetric malpractice litigation and cerebral palsy in term infants. Johnson SL; Blair E; Stanley FJ J Forensic Leg Med; 2011 Apr; 18(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 21420644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Can caesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy? Medico-legal implications of a French ecological study]. Racinet C; Tronc C; Sellier E; Cans C; van Bakel ME Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jan; 43(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25497386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic fetal monitoring: a brief summary of its development, problems and prospects. Martin CB Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Jun; 78(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 9622310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]