These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34019127)
21. Three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short- and mid-term results. Fang S; Wang Y; Xu P; Zhu J; Liu J; Li H; Sun X Int Orthop; 2022 Jun; 46(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35384469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Midterm Outcomes After Reconstruction of Superolateral Acetabular Defects Using Flying Buttress Porous Tantalum Augments During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cassar-Gheiti AJ; Mei XY; Afenu EA; Safir OA; Gross AE; Kuzyk PRT J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2936-2941. PubMed ID: 33840542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings? Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cup-on-cup technique: a reliable management solution for severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement. Chiarlone F; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Alessio Mazzola M; Lovisolo S; Mosconi L; Felli L; Burastero G Hip Int; 2020 Sep; 30(1_suppl):12-18. PubMed ID: 32907429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes of a Double-Cup Construct to Treat Paprosky 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects at a Mean of 39 Months. Liu Q; Zhang RW; Ma RX; Zhu WB; Zhang XZ; Zhu C J Arthroplasty; 2024 Nov; 39(11):2841-2848. PubMed ID: 38823520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects. Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the Trabecular Metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Ballester Alfaro JJ; Sueiro Fernández J Hip Int; 2010; 20 Suppl 7():S119-27. PubMed ID: 20512783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results. Concina C; Crucil M; Gherlinzoni F Acta Biomed; 2022 Mar; 92(S3):e2021549. PubMed ID: 35604256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects. Zhang X; Li Z; Wang W; Liu T; Peng W J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):301. PubMed ID: 32762720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results. Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery. Theil C; Schmidt-Braekling T; Gosheger G; Moellenbeck B; Schwarze J; Dieckmann R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):238. PubMed ID: 31113411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions? Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical study of outcomes after revision surgery using porous titanium custom-made implants for severe acetabular septic bone defects. Burastero G; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Zanirato A; Mosconi L; Felli L; de Lorenzo FDR Int Orthop; 2020 Oct; 44(10):1957-1964. PubMed ID: 32542450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study. Konan S; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS Bone Joint J; 2016 Jun; 98-B(6):767-71. PubMed ID: 27235518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study. Jeong M; Kim HJ; Lim SJ; Moon YW; Park YS Hip Pelvis; 2016 Jun; 28(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 27536651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative survival analysis of porous tantalum and porous titanium acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Vutescu ES; Hsiue P; Paprosky W; Nandi S Hip Int; 2017 Sep; 27(5):505-508. PubMed ID: 28165603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Results of trabecular metal augments in Paprosky IIIA and IIIB defects: A multicentre study. Eachempati KK; Malhotra R; Pichai S; Reddy AVG; Podhili Subramani AK; Gautam D; Bollavaram VR; Sheth NP Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):903-908. PubMed ID: 29954197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts. Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reconstruction of Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects by Three-Dimensional Printed Porous Augment: Techniques and Clinical Outcomes of 18 Consecutive Cases. Fu J; Ni M; Zhu F; Li X; Chai W; Hao L; Zhou Y; Zhang G; Chen J Orthop Surg; 2022 May; 14(5):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 35377531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]