These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34020640)
1. User knowledge factors that hinder the design of new home healthcare devices: investigating thirty-eight devices and their manufacturers. Yang F; Al Mahmud A; Wang T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):166. PubMed ID: 34020640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability challenges in the use of medical devices in the home environment: A systematic review of literature. Tase A; Vadhwana B; Buckle P; Hanna GB Appl Ergon; 2022 Sep; 103():103769. PubMed ID: 35430424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives. Money AG; Barnett J; Kuljis J; Craven MP; Martin JL; Young T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Feb; 11():15. PubMed ID: 21356097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM. Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel Bluetooth-Enabled Tubeless Insulin Pump: A User Experience Design Approach for a Connected Digital Diabetes Management Platform. Pillalamarri SS; Huyett LM; Abdel-Malek A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 12(6):1132-1142. PubMed ID: 30304951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding sharps injuries in home healthcare: The Safe Home Care qualitative methods study to identify pathways for injury prevention. Markkanen P; Galligan C; Laramie A; Fisher J; Sama S; Quinn M BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():359. PubMed ID: 25885473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework. Bird M; McGillion M; Chambers EM; Dix J; Fajardo CJ; Gilmour M; Levesque K; Lim A; Mierdel S; Ouellette C; Polanski AN; Reaume SV; Whitmore C; Carter N Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Mar; 7(1):12. PubMed ID: 33648588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards a conceptual model for the use of home healthcare medical devices: The multi-parameter monitor case. Reyes P; Larée D; Weinstein A; Jara Á PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208723. PubMed ID: 30532224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: a case in the homecare field. De Rouck S; Jacobs A; Leys M Int J Med Inform; 2008 Sep; 77(9):589-601. PubMed ID: 18248846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Shah SG; Robinson I; AlShawi S Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 19845981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and evaluation of a prototype of augmented reality applied to medical devices. Escalada-Hernández P; Soto Ruiz N; San Martín-Rodríguez L Int J Med Inform; 2019 Aug; 128():87-92. PubMed ID: 31126843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical devices in the home: a unique challenge for the FDA. Fu M; Weick-Brady M; Tanno E Work; 2012; 41(3):361-5. PubMed ID: 22398505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing-Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design. Wegner S; Lohmeyer Q; Wahlen D; Neumann S; Groebli JC; Meboldt M JMIR Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 7(2):e15581. PubMed ID: 32490840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalized Monitoring and Assistive Systems: Case Study of Efficient Home Solutions. Lhotska L; Doležal J; Adolf J; Potůček J; Křížek M; Chbani B Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 249():19-28. PubMed ID: 29866952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient safety and interactive medical devices: Realigning work as imagined and work as done. Blandford A; Furniss D; Vincent C Clin Risk; 2014 Sep; 20(5):107-110. PubMed ID: 25866466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. LeRouge C; Ma J; Sneha S; Tolle K Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e251-68. PubMed ID: 21481635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs. Kayser L; Kushniruk A; Osborne RH; Norgaard O; Turner P JMIR Hum Factors; 2015 May; 2(1):e9. PubMed ID: 27025228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Development of a Methodology for Contextual User Research in Healthcare Design Projects. Healion D; O'Dowd E; Russell S Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 256():239-249. PubMed ID: 30371480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User-centred design for developing e-Health system for renal patients at home (AppNephro). Calvillo-Arbizu J; Roa-Romero LM; Estudillo-Valderrama MA; Salgueira-Lazo M; Aresté-Fosalba N; Del-Castillo-Rodríguez NL; González-Cabrera F; Marrero-Robayna S; López-de-la-Manzana V; Román-Martínez I Int J Med Inform; 2019 May; 125():47-54. PubMed ID: 30914180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. Shah SG; Robinson I Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(6-7):500-15. PubMed ID: 17100220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]