These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34020640)

  • 21. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidetomeasure-OT: A mobile 3D application to improve the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of clinician-led home-based falls-risk assessments.
    Hamm J; Money A; Atwal A
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 129():349-365. PubMed ID: 31445277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Elder acceptance of health monitoring devices in the home.
    Mann WC; Marchant T; Tomita M; Fraas L; Stanton K
    Care Manag J; 2001-2002 Winter; 3(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 12455220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Roles of assistive devices for home care staff in Sweden: a qualitative study.
    Pettersson I; Fahlström G
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010; 5(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 19968568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies.
    Lehoux P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Oct; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 15462682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical technology at home: safety-related items in technical documentation.
    Hilbers ES; de Vries CG; Geertsma RE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Jan; 29(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23290519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
    Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of User Characteristics on the Usability of a Home-Connected Medical Device (Smart Angel) for Ambulatory Monitoring: Usability Study.
    Chaniaud N; Megalakaki O; Capo S; Loup-Escande E
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 8(1):e24846. PubMed ID: 33729161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors that influence user satisfaction: tracheotomised home mechanical ventilation users' experiences.
    Dyrstad DN; Hansen BS; Gundersen EM
    J Clin Nurs; 2013 Feb; 22(3-4):331-8. PubMed ID: 23240989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design considerations for medical devices in the home environment.
    Kaufman-Rivi D; Collins-Mitchell J; Jetley R
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; Suppl Home Healthcare():21-6. PubMed ID: 22049603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using Qualitative Methods to Create a Home Health Web Application User Interface for Patients with Low Computer Proficiency.
    Baier RR; Cooper E; Wysocki A; Gravenstein S; Clark M
    EGEMS (Wash DC); 2015; 3(2):1166. PubMed ID: 26290893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
    Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Patient endangerment due to device diversity? : Discussion of a risk factor based on the results of two surveys of German hospitals].
    Lange K; Brinker A; Nowak M; Zöllner C; Lauer W
    Anaesthesist; 2018 Jul; 67(7):496-503. PubMed ID: 29802440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrating Key User Characteristics in User-Centered Design of Digital Support Systems for Seniors' Physical Activity Interventions to Prevent Falls: Protocol for a Usability Study.
    Revenäs Å; Johansson AC; Ehn M
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e20061. PubMed ID: 33346732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Digital Cognitive Aid for Anesthesia to Support Intraoperative Crisis Management: Results of the User-Centered Design Process.
    Schild S; Sedlmayr B; Schumacher AK; Sedlmayr M; Prokosch HU; St Pierre M;
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e13226. PubMed ID: 31033445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Usability in telemedicine systems-A literature survey.
    Klaassen B; van Beijnum BJ; Hermens HJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Sep; 93():57-69. PubMed ID: 27435948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Prior Health Knowledge on the Usability of Two Home Medical Devices: Usability Study.
    Chaniaud N; Métayer N; Megalakaki O; Loup-Escande E
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e17983. PubMed ID: 32955454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users?
    Campling NC; Pitts DG; Knight PV; Aspinall R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):455. PubMed ID: 28676054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.