130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34020846)
1. Comparison Between 360° 3-D Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Vaginal Invasion in Cervical Cancer: A Preliminary Report.
Zhu Y; Lu M; Dai KJ; Liu C; He R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2250-2257. PubMed ID: 34020846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Byun JM; Kim YN; Jeong DH; Kim KT; Sung MS; Lee KB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Oct; 23(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 24257560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Preliminary study of the clinical value of colposcopy in diagnosing vagina invasion in cervical cancer].
Zhu YL; Zhang WH; Liu BB; Zhang P; Zhang J; Wang L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 55(5):322-326. PubMed ID: 32464720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for evaluation of local invasion by cervical cancer.
Zheng W; Chen K; Peng C; Yin SH; Pan YY; Liu M; Lin SY; Pei XQ
Br J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 91(1091):20170858. PubMed ID: 30028181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
Rasmussen CK; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):657-666. PubMed ID: 30182497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial cancer: preoperative evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography.
Zarbo G; Caruso G; Caruso S; Mangano U; Zarbo R
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 10726632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myoma Imaging by Gynecologic Surgeons Training in Intraoperative Ultrasound Technique.
Bent RE; Wilson MD; Jacoby VL; Varon S; Parvataneni R; Saberi N; Waetjen LE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1139-1143. PubMed ID: 30502500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Preoperative imaging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis in: Transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging].
Gauche Cazalis C; Koskas M; Martin B; Palazzo L; Madelenat P; Yazbeck C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Nov; 40(11):634-41. PubMed ID: 23123282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound versus MRI in the PreOperative Diagnostics of low-grade Endometrial Cancer (PODEC) study: a prospective multicentre study.
Palmér M; Åkesson Å; Marcickiewicz J; Blank E; Hogström L; Torle M; Mateoiu C; Dahm-Kähler P; Leonhardt H
Clin Radiol; 2023 Jan; 78(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 36270868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding Patient Preference in Female Pelvic Imaging: Transvaginal Ultrasound and MRI.
Sakala MD; Carlos RC; Mendiratta-Lala M; Quint EH; Maturen KE
Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 29241597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical evaluation of the specificity of MRI and TVUS for differentiation of malignant from benign adnexal lesions.
Reuter M; Steffens J; Schüppler U; Lüttges J; Muhle C; Brinkmann G; Maschek A; Weisner D; Spielmann R; Heller M
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9442126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictability of myometrial, lower uterine segment and cervical invasion with 3D transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.
Yildirim N; Saatli B; Kose S; Sancar C; Ulukus C; Koyuncuoglu M; Saygili U; Obuz F
Med Ultrason; 2018 Aug; 20(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 30167589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Detecting Cervical Invasion In Women With Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Alcázar JL; Pérez L; Güell O; Haro N; Manzour N; Chacon E; Jurado M
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):179-189. PubMed ID: 29732585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasonography Scanning for Preoperative Assessment of High Risk in Women with Endometrial Cancer.
Yang T; Tian S; Li Y; Tian X; Wang W; Zhao J; Pei M; Zhao M; Wang L; Quan S; Yang X
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Mar; 25():2024-2031. PubMed ID: 30883538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ultrasound and MRI informativeness for detection and treatment monitoring of cervical cancer metastases in the vagina.
Golovko TS; Bakai OA; Ashykhmin AV; Baranovskaya LM
Exp Oncol; 2021 Dec; 43(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 34967543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
