These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Liability and compensation aspects of immunization injury: a call for reform. McIntosh WK Osgoode Hall Law J; 1980 Dec; 18(4):584-613. PubMed ID: 11658622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What are your odds in the prenatal gamble? Chapman S Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Mar; 7(3):30-6. PubMed ID: 423686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On a decision-making paradigm of medical informed consent. Merz JF J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 8340710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal and social issues in medical genetics. Turner JH; Hayashi TT; Pogoloff DD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 May; 134(1):83-99. PubMed ID: 375738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Fitness" for birth and reproduction: legal implications of genetic screening. Annas GJ; Coyne B Fam Law Q; 1975; 9(3):463-89. PubMed ID: 11664499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth. Scott R Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal liability and epidemiologic research. Berger PM; Stallones RA Am J Epidemiol; 1977 Sep; 106(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 900116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure. Hertz J Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal barriers to implementing recommendations for universal, routine prenatal HIV testing. Wolf LE; Lo B; Gostin LO J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 15152437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "new" genetics: emerging medicolegal issues in the prenatal issues in the prenatal diagnosis of hereditary disorders. Milunsky A; Reilly P Am J Law Med; 1975 Mar; 1(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 1234716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who's afraid of whom? Courts require HIV-infected doctors to obtain informed consent of patients. Logan MK De Paul Law Rev; 1995; 44(2):483-511. PubMed ID: 11660217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Torts and the double helix: malpractice liability for failure to warn of genetic risks. Andrews LB Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):149-84. PubMed ID: 11656665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]