BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34022074)

  • 1. Feasibility of non-invasive measurement of central blood pressure and arterial stiffness in shock.
    Markakis K; Pagonas N; Georgianou E; Zgoura P; Rohn BJ; Bertram S; Seidel M; Bettag S; Trappe HJ; Babel N; Westhoff TH; Seibert FS
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2021 Sep; 51(9):e13587. PubMed ID: 34022074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of fully automated oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement techniques.
    Gotzmann M; Hogeweg M; Seibert FS; Rohn BJ; Bergbauer M; Babel N; Bauer F; Mügge A; Westhoff TH
    J Hypertens; 2020 Feb; 38(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 31503132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unreliable Estimation of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Provided by the Mobil-O-Graph Algorithm-Based System in Marfan Syndrome.
    Salvi P; Furlanis G; Grillo A; Pini A; Salvi L; Marelli S; Rovina M; Moretti F; Gaetano R; Pintassilgo I; Faini A; Fabris B; Carretta R; Parati G
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e04028. PubMed ID: 31020905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulse wave velocity in South African women and children: comparison between the Mobil-O-Graph and SphygmoCor XCEL devices.
    Kolkenbeck-Ruh A; Soepnel LM; Kim AW; Naidoo S; Smith W; Davies J; Ware LJ
    J Hypertens; 2022 Jan; 40(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 34285149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric method for estimating central systolic pressure in hemodialysis patients.
    Sarafidis PA; Georgianos PI; Karpetas A; Bikos A; Korelidou L; Tersi M; Divanis D; Tzanis G; Mavromatidis K; Liakopoulos V; Zebekakis PE; Lasaridis A; Protogerou AD
    Am J Nephrol; 2014; 40(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 25322847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of a Newly-Introduced Oscillometric Device for the Estimation of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Preliminary Validation Study.
    Vaios V; Georgianos PI; Pikilidou MI; Eleftheriadis T; Zarogiannis S; Papagianni A; Zebekakis PE; Liakopoulos V
    Adv Perit Dial; 2018 Nov; 34(2018):24-31. PubMed ID: 30480533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of oscillometric central blood pressure and central systolic loading in individuals over 50 years: Effects of posture and fasting.
    Mitchelmore A; Stoner L; Lambrick D; Jobson S; Faulkner J
    Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():79-85. PubMed ID: 29339276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood pressure measurement in patients with cardiogenic shock: the effect of norepinephrine.
    Hromádka M; Tůmová P; Rokyta R; Seidlerová J
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Oct; 24(5):213-220. PubMed ID: 31490245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reproducibility of arterial pulse wave velocity measurement using new device with oscillometric technique: a pilot study.
    Naidu MU; Reddy BM; Yashmaina S; Patnaik AN; Rani PU
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Aug; 4():49. PubMed ID: 16115324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of pulse wave analysis parameters by oscillometry in hypertensive diabetic and nondiabetic patients in a Brazilian outpatient care.
    Resende LAPR; Silva MAV; Resende JAM; Resende EAMR; Silva VJD; Correia D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(50):e18100. PubMed ID: 31852069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study.
    Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the augmentation index and pulse pressure amplification as determined by the SphygmoCor XCEL device: a comparison with invasive measurements.
    Nakagomi A; Shoji T; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    Hypertens Res; 2018 Jan; 41(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28978987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method.
    Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated oscillometric blood pressure and pulse-wave acquisition for evaluation of vascular stiffness in atherosclerosis.
    Massmann A; Stemler J; Fries P; Kubale R; Kraushaar LE; Buecker A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 106(7):514-524. PubMed ID: 28168512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to interpret 24-h arterial stiffness markers: comparison of 24-h ambulatory Mobil-O-Graph with SphygmoCor office values.
    Berukstis A; Jarasunas J; Daskeviciute A; Ryliskyte L; Baranauskas A; Steponeniene R; Laucevicius A
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30741746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pulse wave analysis using the Mobil-O-Graph, Arteriograph and Complior device: a comparative study.
    Benas D; Kornelakis M; Triantafyllidi H; Kostelli G; Pavlidis G; Varoudi M; Vlastos D; Lambadiari V; Parissis J; Ikonomidis I
    Blood Press; 2019 Apr; 28(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 30668163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oscillometry and applanation tonometry measurements in older individuals with elevated levels of arterial stiffness.
    van Dijk SC; Enneman AW; Swart KM; van Schoor NM; Uitterlinden AG; Smulders YM; van den Meiracker AH; van der Velde N; Mattace-Raso FU
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24192847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study.
    Luzardo L; Lujambio I; Sottolano M; da Rosa A; Thijs L; Noboa O; Staessen JA; Boggia J
    Hypertens Res; 2012 Oct; 35(10):980-7. PubMed ID: 22622282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-Term Repeatability of Noninvasive Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment: Comparison Between Methods and Devices.
    Grillo A; Parati G; Rovina M; Moretti F; Salvi L; Gao L; Baldi C; Sorropago G; Faini A; Millasseau SC; Scalise F; Carretta R; Salvi P
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Dec; 31(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 29059329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.