These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34022737)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment.
    Hezer S; Gelmez E; Özceylan E
    J Infect Public Health; 2021 Jun; 14(6):775-786. PubMed ID: 34022737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian BWM and VIKOR-based model for assessing hospital preparedness in the face of disasters.
    Saner HS; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Nat Hazards (Dordr); 2022; 111(2):1603-1635. PubMed ID: 34803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models.
    Ameri AA; Pourghasemi HR; Cerda A
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1385-1400. PubMed ID: 29898506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.
    Öztürk N; Tozan H; Vayvay Ö
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32455609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal evaluation of crop residues for gasification in Ghana using integrated multi-criterial decision making techniques.
    Osei I; Addo A; Kemausuor F
    Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20553. PubMed ID: 37822638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
    Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.
    Pourghasemi HR; Honarmandnejad F; Rezaei M; Tarazkar MH; Sadhasivam N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37894-37917. PubMed ID: 33723776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.
    Mitra R; Das J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16036-16067. PubMed ID: 36180798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combination of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and morphometric parameters for prioritizing the erodibility of sub-watersheds in the Ouljet Es Soltane basin (North of Morocco).
    El Abassi M; Ousmana H; Saouita J; El-Hmaidi A; Iallamen Z; Jaddi H; Aouragh MH; Boufala M; Kasse Z; El Ouali A; Abdallaoui A
    Heliyon; 2024 Oct; 10(19):e38228. PubMed ID: 39430464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaccine selection for COVID-19 by AHP and novel VIKOR hybrid approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
    Meni Z B; Özkan EM
    Eng Appl Artif Intell; 2023 Mar; 119():105812. PubMed ID: 36624893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Novel Approach to Multi-Provider Network Slice Selector for 5G and Future Communication Systems.
    da Silva DC; Batista JOR; de Sousa MAF; Mostaço GM; Monteiro CC; Bressan G; Cugnasca CE; Silveira RM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of multi-criteria and artificial intelligence models for land-subsidence susceptibility zonation.
    Arabameri A; Chandra Pal S; Rezaie F; Chakrabortty R; Chowdhuri I; Blaschke T; Thi Ngo PT
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 284():112067. PubMed ID: 33556831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pain Treatment Evaluation in COVID-19 Patients with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria Decision-Making.
    Batur Sir GD; Sir E
    J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():8831114. PubMed ID: 33604012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets.
    Akram M; Muhiuddin G; Santos-García G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 May; 19(7):7201-7231. PubMed ID: 35730303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The study on the evaluation of the pollution control situation of the sewage systems in the counties and cities of Taiwan by applying the VIKOR method.
    Kuo JY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Dec; 24(35):26958-26966. PubMed ID: 26370820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catchment-scale soil conservation: Using climate, vegetation, and topo-hydrological parameters to support decision making and implementation.
    Borji M; Samani AN; Rashidi S; Tiefenbacher JP
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 712():136124. PubMed ID: 31931189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An application of a hybrid MCDM method for the evaluation of entrepreneurial intensity among the SMEs: a case study.
    Rostamzadeh R; Ismail K; Bodaghi Khajeh Noubar H
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():703650. PubMed ID: 25197707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Tzeng GH
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():68-82. PubMed ID: 28750913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile-Based Patient Monitoring Systems: A Prioritisation Framework Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques.
    Almahdi EM; Zaidan AA; Zaidan BB; Alsalem MA; Albahri OS; Albahri AS
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jun; 43(7):219. PubMed ID: 31172296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of health system resilience in 60 countries based on their responses to COVID-19.
    Zhao L; Jin Y; Zhou L; Yang P; Qian Y; Huang X; Min M
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1081068. PubMed ID: 36699903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.