These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3402322)

  • 1. Pupil size and the steady-state pattern reversal visual evoked cortical potential.
    Müller W; Kollert A; Zachert C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988; 68(3-4):357-61. PubMed ID: 3402322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of pupil size on multifocal pattern visual evoked potentials.
    Martins A; Balachandran C; Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Billson FA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 31(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 12880463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of pupil size and other test variables on visual function assessment using visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.
    Salim S; Childers K; Lupinacci AP; Hu GZ; Zemon V; Netland PA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 121(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20145988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relations between visual acuity, refraction and the pattern reversal visual-evoked cortical potential in aphakia.
    Müller W; Schöneich H
    Ophthalmologica; 1989; 198(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2710505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pupil size on canine visual evoked potential with pattern stimulation.
    Maehara S; Itoh Y; Kurimoto W; Kitamura Y; Ito Y; Hayashi M; Masuko A
    J Vet Med Sci; 2020 Jul; 82(7):922-925. PubMed ID: 32435005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The dependence of the cortical topography of visual evoked potentials on the stimulation frequency].
    Shpak AA; Gekht AB
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1992; 108(4-6):33-7. PubMed ID: 1295190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Linearity and nonlinearity of pattern ERG and pattern VECP].
    Yoshii M; Yanashima K; Okisaka S; Suzuki A; Nozawa F
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 96(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 1580226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consensual pupillary responses to mydriatic and miotic drugs.
    Theofilopoulos N; Longmore J; Kerr FA; Szabadi E; Bradshaw CM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1988 Dec; 26(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 3242574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral analysis of visual potentials evoked by pattern-reversal checkerboard in juvenile patients with headache.
    Marrelli A; Tozzi E; Porto C; Cimini N; Aloisi P; Valenti M
    Headache; 2001 Sep; 41(8):792-7. PubMed ID: 11576204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retinal and cortical augmenting-reducing to flash and pattern reversal stimuli.
    Lukas JH; Siegfried JB; Mullins LF
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 40():220-6. PubMed ID: 3480125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of aging on the temporal frequency characteristics determined by pattern visually evoked cortical potentials.
    Adachi-Usami E; Hosoda L; Toyonaga N
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jun; 69(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 3168716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cerebral evoked potentials: a historical review of the marseilles contributions and a preliminary report on a study of the effects of various stimulus parameters on the P90 component of the pattern visual evoked potential.
    Low MD; Purves SJ; Reeves B; Galloway J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1982; (35):369-79. PubMed ID: 6749480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual evoked potentials to various check patterns.
    Röver J; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 3996189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evoked cortical potentials of the cerebral hemispheres during a comparison of visual stimuli].
    Nechaev VB; Kliucharev VA; Kropotov IuD; Ponomarev VA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(2):17-23. PubMed ID: 10816934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Kobashi C; Yamanashi A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 253(8):1341-6. PubMed ID: 25981119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rapid method for measuring miotic activity of drugs in the intact mouse eye.
    Treister G; Maayani S; Sokolovsky M
    Invest Ophthalmol; 1975 Feb; 14(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 1116916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mydriatics and miotics].
    de AGUIAR PM
    Rev Bras Oftalmol; 1951 Jun; 9(4):179-203. PubMed ID: 14865030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.
    Flanagan JG; Harding GF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1986 Jan; 62(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 3956363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Horizontal scalp distribution of steady-state pattern visual evoked cortical potentials in response to quadrant field stimulation.
    Kakisu Y
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 3996191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The stabilization of cortical evoked potentials during selective visual attention].
    Krylov IN; Shuvaev IN; Tret'iakov DA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1998; 48(6):926-35. PubMed ID: 9929902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.