These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34023899)

  • 1. Reward, Salience, and Agency in Event-Related Potentials for Appetitive and Aversive Contexts.
    Stewardson HJ; Sambrook TD
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Oct; 31(11):5006-5014. PubMed ID: 34023899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal dissociation of salience and prediction error responses to appetitive and aversive taste.
    Hird EJ; El-Deredy W; Jones A; Talmi D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28833254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome valence and stimulus frequency affect neural responses to rewards and punishments.
    Glazer J; Nusslock R
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13981. PubMed ID: 34847254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.
    Talmi D; Atkinson R; El-Deredy W
    J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(19):8264-9. PubMed ID: 23658166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medial frontal cortex response to unexpected motivationally salient outcomes.
    Soder HE; Potts GF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):268-276. PubMed ID: 29126885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The aversion positivity: Mediofrontal cortical potentials reflect parametric aversive prediction errors and drive behavioral modification following negative reinforcement.
    Rawls E; Lamm C
    Cortex; 2021 Jul; 140():26-39. PubMed ID: 33905968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The electrocortical response to rewarding and aversive feedback: The reward positivity does not reflect salience in simple gambling tasks.
    Mulligan EM; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):262-267. PubMed ID: 29183793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of reward magnitude on reward processing: An averaged and single trial event-related potential study.
    Meadows CC; Gable PA; Lohse KR; Miller MW
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():154-160. PubMed ID: 27288743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
    Walsh MM; Anderson JR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Sep; 36(8):1870-84. PubMed ID: 22683741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):213-35. PubMed ID: 25495239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unraveling the influence of trial-based motivational changes on performance monitoring stages in a flanker task.
    Overmeyer R; Kirschner H; Fischer AG; Endrass T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19180. PubMed ID: 37932359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction-error-dependent processing of immediate and delayed positive feedback.
    Weber C; Bellebaum C
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9674. PubMed ID: 38678065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mediofrontal event-related potentials in response to positive, negative and unsigned prediction errors.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():1-10. PubMed ID: 24946315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective preferences differentially modulate the processing of rewards gained by own vs. observed choices.
    Peterburs J; Sannemann L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107139. PubMed ID: 31295450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.
    Potts GF; Martin LE; Kamp SM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Feb; 48(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 20557487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.