210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34026714)
1. Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
He B; Chen W; Liu L; Hou Z; Zhu H; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Zhan S; Wang S
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():654454. PubMed ID: 34026714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The risk prediction models for occurrence of cervical cancer: a systematic review].
He BJ; Chen WY; Liu LL; Zhu HY; Cheng HZ; Zhang YX; Wang SF; Zhan SY
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 42(10):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 34814624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic models for patients suffering a heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review.
Jia YY; Cui NQ; Jia TT; Song JP
ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Jun; 11(3):1341-1351. PubMed ID: 38318693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of prognostic models to predict stillbirth using International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network database: individual participant data meta-analysis.
Allotey J; Whittle R; Snell KIE; Smuk M; Townsend R; von Dadelszen P; Heazell AEP; Magee L; Smith GCS; Sandall J; Thilaganathan B; Zamora J; Riley RD; Khalil A; Thangaratinam S;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 59(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 34405928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal.
Bellou V; Belbasis L; Konstantinidis AK; Tzoulaki I; Evangelou E
BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5358. PubMed ID: 31585960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive accuracy of risk prediction models for recurrence, metastasis and survival for early-stage cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review.
Kunonga TP; Kenny RPW; Astin M; Bryant A; Kontogiannis V; Coughlan D; Richmond C; Eastaugh CH; Beyer FR; Pearson F; Craig D; Lovat P; Vale L; Ellis R
BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e073306. PubMed ID: 37770261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by systemic therapy: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Li L; Li X; Li W; Ding X; Zhang Y; Chen J; Li W
BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):750. PubMed ID: 35810271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation.
Ensor J; Riley RD; Jowett S; Monahan M; Snell KIe; Bayliss S; Moore D; Fitzmaurice D;
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(12):i-xxxiii, 1-190. PubMed ID: 26879848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction Models for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.
Peng HB; Zhan YL; Chen Y; Jin ZC; Liu F; Wang B; Yu ZB
Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():856159. PubMed ID: 35633976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive Models for Estimating the Probability of Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.
Black N; Henderson I; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 140(5):821-841. PubMed ID: 36201785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction models for the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review.
Lamain-de Ruiter M; Kwee A; Naaktgeboren CA; Franx A; Moons KGM; Koster MPH
Diagn Progn Res; 2017; 1():3. PubMed ID: 31093535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of methodological quality of model development studies predicting prognostic outcome for resectable pancreatic cancer.
Bradley A; Van Der Meer R; McKay CJ
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e027192. PubMed ID: 31439598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome prediction models incorporating clinical variables for Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review of methodological conduct and risk of bias.
Aly F; Hansen CR; Al Mouiee D; Sundaresan P; Haidar A; Vinod S; Holloway L
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109629. PubMed ID: 36934895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical appraisal of the prognostic predictive models for patients with sepsis: Which model can be applied in clinical practice?
Beneyto-Ripoll C; Palazón-Bru A; Llópez-Espinós P; Martínez-Díaz AM; Gil-Guillén VF; de Los Ángeles Carbonell-Torregrosa M
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 75(8):e14044. PubMed ID: 33492724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
